Search: reassessment

1 result for “reassessment”+ Section 80P(2)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai33 Chennai28 Jaipur15 Ahmedabad14 Chandigarh12 Bangalore11 Visakhapatnam10 Kolkata10 Pune9 Hyderabad9 Cochin9 Jodhpur6 Amritsar4 Panaji2 Delhi2 Indore1 Lucknow1 Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 1428 Section 80P3 Section 153(2)(a)2 Section 80P(2)2 Section 142(2)(a)2

U.P.COOPERATIVE FEDERATIONLTD,LUCKNOW vs. ITO-2(3), , LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 260/LKW/2023[2003-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow19 Dec 2025AY 2003-14

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshraआयकर अपील सं/ Ita No.260/Lkw/2023 ननिाारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2003-04 U.P. Cooperative Federation V. Income Tax Officer-2(3) Ltd Pratyaksh Kar Bhawan, Pcf Building, 32, Station Road, 57, Ram Tirath Marg, Lucknow-226004. Hazratganj, Lucknow- 226001. Pan:Aaaau0373P अपीलार्थी/(Appellant) प्रत्यर्थी/(Respondent) अपीलार्थी कक और से/Appellant By: Shri D. D. Chopra, Advocate प्रत्यर्थी कक और से /Respondent By: Shri Neeraj Kumar, Cit(Dr) सुनवाई कक तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 22 09 2025 घोर्णा कक तारीख/ Date Of 19 12 2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri D. D. Chopra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Neeraj Kumar, CIT(DR)

Section 142Section 142(2)(a)Section 153(2)(a)Section 271Section 80PSection 80P(2)

d) and (e) of the Act, and the same was accordingly allowed to the extent of claim made. However, the impugned additions had resulted in an increase in the ‘gross total income’ of the appellant. The additions made b. It is the submission of the Appellant that the Ld. AO and CIT(A) has erred in allowing the deduction