BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “reassessment”+ Section 54Fclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi41Hyderabad16Jaipur14Chennai14Mumbai9Patna9Nagpur9Ahmedabad8Lucknow7Indore7Raipur7Visakhapatnam6Jodhpur6Kolkata5Bangalore5Chandigarh2Agra2Pune2Amritsar2Cochin1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 694Section 253(3)4Section 145(3)4Section 142(1)4Condonation of Delay4Section 69A3Section 1323Section 54F3Addition to Income3Search & Seizure

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT, (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

ITA 347/LKW/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2014-15
Section 145(3)Section 54FSection 56(2)(vii)Section 69

sections": ["147", "148", "153A", "153D", "56(2)(vii)(b)", "145(3)", "40A(3)", "80G", "54F"], "issues": "The primary issues revolve around the validity of reassessment

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

ITA 353/LKW/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2022-23
Section 145(3)Section 54F
3
Section 1482
Unexplained Investment2
Section 69

54F \nof Income Tax Act, 1961. \n\n6. Whether on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in \ndeleting the addition of Rs.1,00,000/- in respect of gift received from father Shri \nSurya Narayan Pandey without appreciating the fact that the assessee has not \nproduced any documentary evidence in support of his claim

KARUNESH KUMAR SHUKLA,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(1), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 668/LKW/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow30 Jan 2026AY 2018-19
For Appellant: Sh. Samrat Chandra, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Koushlendra Tiwari, CIT DR
Section 144Section 148Section 69Section 69A

reassessment by issue of notice under section 148 after following the prescribed procedure. The ld. AO records that several opportunities were given to the assessee to make compliance before the ld. AO but even though the notices were also sent by speed post and email, no compliance was made by the assessee. Thereafter, the ld. AO proceeded to complete

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT(CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

ITA 350/LKW/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2017-18
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 250Section 253(3)

54F of the Act. The Ld. CIT(A)\nconsidering the facts and circumstances of the case and in accordance with\nlaw has allowed the appeal.\nIssue No. 11 – AY 2021-22\nAddition due to Non deduction of TDS on payment of Rs.3074000\n@ 30% i.e. 922200/- in violation of the provision of section\n40a(ia)\nIn relevant year

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW vs. RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY, GONDA U.P.

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

ITA 460/LKW/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 132Section 253(3)

54F of the Act. The Ld. CIT(A) considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in accordance with law has allowed the appeal. Issue No. 11 – AY 2021-22 Addition due to Non deduction of TDS on payment of Rs. 3074000 @ 30% i.e. 922200/- in violation of the provision of section 40a(ia) In relevant year

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

ITA 349/LKW/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 132Section 253(3)

54F of the Act. The Ld. CIT(A) considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in accordance with law has allowed the appeal. Issue No. 11 – AY 2021-22 Addition due to Non deduction of TDS on payment of Rs. 3074000 @ 30% i.e. 922200/- in violation of the provision of section 40a(ia) In relevant year

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

ITA 351/LKW/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 132Section 253(3)

54F of the Act. The Ld. CIT(A) considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in accordance with law has allowed the appeal. Issue No. 11 – AY 2021-22 Addition due to Non deduction of TDS on payment of Rs. 3074000 @ 30% i.e. 922200/- in violation of the provision of section 40a(ia) In relevant year