Search: reassessment

6 results for “reassessment”+ Section 270A(8)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 14715 Section 41(1)8 Section 143(3)5 Section 143(2)4 Section 684 Section 69C4 Section 1513 Section 292C3 Reassessment3 Addition to Income

ISHRAT BEG,SITAPUR vs. ITO, SITAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 392/LKW/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow25 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastavaassessment Year: 2017-18 Ishrat Beg V. The Income Tax Officer S/O Akhtar Beg Sitapur Katra Astal, Laharpur Sitapur (U.P) Tan/Pan:Aoypb5773P (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri K. R. Rastogi, C.A. Respondent By: Shri Saurabh Dubey, D.R. O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri K. R. Rastogi, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Saurabh Dubey, D.R

Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 154BSection 44A

270A, 271A and 271B of the Act, separately. 2.2 Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the NFAC and placed reliance on the order of the ITAT, Lucknow Bench in the assessee’s own case for assessment year 2012-13. However, the appeal of the assessee came to be dismissed. 3.0 Now, the Assessee has approached this Tribunal challenging

ISHRAT BEG,SITAPUR vs. ITO, SITAPUR

ISHRAT BEG,SITAPUR vs. ITO, SITAPUR

M/S FIVE ROSES,KANPUR vs. DY, CIT-CC-1, KANPUR

M/S FIVE ROSES,KANPUR vs. J/DCIT-CC,, KANPUR

M/S FIVE ROSES,KANPUR vs. DY, CIT-CC-1, KANPUR

MOHD. ASFAND AKHTAR,KANPUR vs. DEPUTI COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CC-2, KANPUR

DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CC-2,, KANPUR vs. SHRI.MOHAMMAD ASFAND AKHTAR, KANPUR