Search: reassessment

6 results for “reassessment”+ Section 270A(10)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 14715 Section 41(1)8 Section 143(3)5 Section 143(2)4 Section 684 Section 69C4 Section 1513 Section 292C3 Reassessment3 Addition to Income

ISHRAT BEG,SITAPUR vs. ITO, SITAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 392/LKW/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow25 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastavaassessment Year: 2017-18 Ishrat Beg V. The Income Tax Officer S/O Akhtar Beg Sitapur Katra Astal, Laharpur Sitapur (U.P) Tan/Pan:Aoypb5773P (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri K. R. Rastogi, C.A. Respondent By: Shri Saurabh Dubey, D.R. O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri K. R. Rastogi, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Saurabh Dubey, D.R

Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 154BSection 44A

10,253/-, which was treated as business income of the assessee. The AO, after applying rate of 8% under section 44AD of the Act, calculated the business income of the assessee for the year under consideration at Rs.10,48,820/-. After subtracting net profit of Rs.3,32,040/- declared by the assessee from the business income estimated

ISHRAT BEG,SITAPUR vs. ITO, SITAPUR

ISHRAT BEG,SITAPUR vs. ITO, SITAPUR

M/S FIVE ROSES,KANPUR vs. DY, CIT-CC-1, KANPUR

M/S FIVE ROSES,KANPUR vs. J/DCIT-CC,, KANPUR

M/S FIVE ROSES,KANPUR vs. DY, CIT-CC-1, KANPUR

MOHD. ASFAND AKHTAR,KANPUR vs. DEPUTI COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CC-2, KANPUR

DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CC-2,, KANPUR vs. SHRI.MOHAMMAD ASFAND AKHTAR, KANPUR