BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

35 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Survey u/s 133Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai339Delhi302Jaipur149Pune130Bangalore128Hyderabad86Chennai69Visakhapatnam63Ahmedabad61Surat60Kolkata56Indore48Rajkot44Lucknow35Chandigarh32Amritsar27Cochin16Patna16Ranchi15Nagpur10Cuttack10Karnataka10Panaji10Jodhpur8Raipur7Allahabad7Guwahati4Agra3Dehradun2SC2Telangana2Punjab & Haryana1Calcutta1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(b)112Section 133A51Section 142(1)43Section 14442Section 14235Addition to Income32Survey u/s 133A32Section 13224Penalty23

M/S NIKKI GLOBAL FINANCE LTD,NEW DELHI vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, KANPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 275/LKW/2020[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Dec 2022AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigam, DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250(6)Section 271Section 271(1)(b)

penalty of Rs. 10,000/- u/s. 271(1)(b) of the Act for each of the seven years involved, respectively. 3. Brief facts of the case are that a survey u/s. 133A

Showing 1–20 of 35 · Page 1 of 2

Section 250(6)22
Section 6921
Search & Seizure10

M/S. NIKKI GLOBAL FINANCE LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 274/LKW/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Dec 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigam, DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250(6)Section 271Section 271(1)(b)

penalty of Rs. 10,000/- u/s. 271(1)(b) of the Act for each of the seven years involved, respectively. 3. Brief facts of the case are that a survey u/s. 133A

M/S. NIKKI GLOBAL FINANCE LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. THE DCIT, CC-1, KANPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 270/LKW/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Dec 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigam, DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250(6)Section 271Section 271(1)(b)

penalty of Rs. 10,000/- u/s. 271(1)(b) of the Act for each of the seven years involved, respectively. 3. Brief facts of the case are that a survey u/s. 133A

SHRI ASHESH AGARWAL,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 292/LKW/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Dec 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigam, DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250(6)Section 271Section 271(1)(b)

penalty of Rs. 10,000/- u/s. 271(1)(b) of the Act for each of the seven years involved, respectively. 3. Brief facts of the case are that a survey u/s. 133A

SHRI ASHESH AGARWAL,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 293/LKW/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Dec 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigam, DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250(6)Section 271Section 271(1)(b)

penalty of Rs. 10,000/- u/s. 271(1)(b) of the Act for each of the seven years involved, respectively. 3. Brief facts of the case are that a survey u/s. 133A

SHRI ASHESH AGARWAL,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 294/LKW/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Dec 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigam, DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250(6)Section 271Section 271(1)(b)

penalty of Rs. 10,000/- u/s. 271(1)(b) of the Act for each of the seven years involved, respectively. 3. Brief facts of the case are that a survey u/s. 133A

SHRI ASHESH AGARWAL,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 295/LKW/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Dec 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigam, DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250(6)Section 271Section 271(1)(b)

penalty of Rs. 10,000/- u/s. 271(1)(b) of the Act for each of the seven years involved, respectively. 3. Brief facts of the case are that a survey u/s. 133A

SHRI ASHESH AGARWAL,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 296/LKW/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Dec 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigam, DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250(6)Section 271Section 271(1)(b)

penalty of Rs. 10,000/- u/s. 271(1)(b) of the Act for each of the seven years involved, respectively. 3. Brief facts of the case are that a survey u/s. 133A

SHRI ASHESH AGARWAL,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 297/LKW/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigam, DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250(6)Section 271Section 271(1)(b)

penalty of Rs. 10,000/- u/s. 271(1)(b) of the Act for each of the seven years involved, respectively. 3. Brief facts of the case are that a survey u/s. 133A

SHRI ASHESH AGARWAL,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 298/LKW/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Dec 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigam, DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250(6)Section 271Section 271(1)(b)

penalty of Rs. 10,000/- u/s. 271(1)(b) of the Act for each of the seven years involved, respectively. 3. Brief facts of the case are that a survey u/s. 133A

M/S. NIKKI GLOBAL FINANCE LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 273/LKW/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Dec 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigam, DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250(6)Section 271Section 271(1)(b)

penalty of Rs. 10,000/- u/s. 271(1)(b) of the Act for each of the seven years involved, respectively. 3. Brief facts of the case are that a survey u/s. 133A

M/S. NIKKI GLOBAL FINANCE LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 276/LKW/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Dec 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigam, DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250(6)Section 271Section 271(1)(b)

penalty of Rs. 10,000/- u/s. 271(1)(b) of the Act for each of the seven years involved, respectively. 3. Brief facts of the case are that a survey u/s. 133A

M/S. NIKKI GLOBAL FINANCE LTD.,, NEW DELHI vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 272/LKW/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Dec 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigam, DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250(6)Section 271Section 271(1)(b)

penalty of Rs. 10,000/- u/s. 271(1)(b) of the Act for each of the seven years involved, respectively. 3. Brief facts of the case are that a survey u/s. 133A

M/S. NIKKI GLOBAL FINANCE LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 271/LKW/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Dec 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigam, DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250(6)Section 271Section 271(1)(b)

penalty of Rs. 10,000/- u/s. 271(1)(b) of the Act for each of the seven years involved, respectively. 3. Brief facts of the case are that a survey u/s. 133A

M/S. BANSAL SUPPLIERS PVT. LTD.,,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 288/LKW/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Dec 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigam, DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250(6)Section 271(1)(b)

survey u/s. 133A of the Act was converted into search u/s. 132 of the Act. In the course of search, various incriminating documents/information relating to the assessee were also found and seized as noted by the Ld. AO in the order. In the course of assessment, Ld. AO found that accounts of the assessee were voluminous and complex

M/S. BANSAL SUPPLIERS PVT. LTD.,,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 286/LKW/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Dec 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigam, DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250(6)Section 271(1)(b)

survey u/s. 133A of the Act was converted into search u/s. 132 of the Act. In the course of search, various incriminating documents/information relating to the assessee were also found and seized as noted by the Ld. AO in the order. In the course of assessment, Ld. AO found that accounts of the assessee were voluminous and complex

M/S. BANSAL SUPPLIERS PVT. LTD.,,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 284/LKW/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Dec 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigam, DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250(6)Section 271(1)(b)

survey u/s. 133A of the Act was converted into search u/s. 132 of the Act. In the course of search, various incriminating documents/information relating to the assessee were also found and seized as noted by the Ld. AO in the order. In the course of assessment, Ld. AO found that accounts of the assessee were voluminous and complex

M/S. BANSAL SUPPLIERS PVT. LTD.,,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 285/LKW/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Dec 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigam, DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250(6)Section 271(1)(b)

survey u/s. 133A of the Act was converted into search u/s. 132 of the Act. In the course of search, various incriminating documents/information relating to the assessee were also found and seized as noted by the Ld. AO in the order. In the course of assessment, Ld. AO found that accounts of the assessee were voluminous and complex

M/S. BANSAL SUPPLIERS PVT. LTD.,,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 287/LKW/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Dec 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigam, DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250(6)Section 271(1)(b)

survey u/s. 133A of the Act was converted into search u/s. 132 of the Act. In the course of search, various incriminating documents/information relating to the assessee were also found and seized as noted by the Ld. AO in the order. In the course of assessment, Ld. AO found that accounts of the assessee were voluminous and complex

M/S. BANSAL SUPPLIERS PVT. LTD.,,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

The appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 290/LKW/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Dec 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigam, DR
Section 132Section 133ASection 142Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250(6)Section 271(1)(b)

survey u/s. 133A of the Act was converted into search u/s. 132 of the Act. In the course of search, various incriminating documents/information relating to the assessee were also found and seized as noted by the Ld. AO in the order. In the course of assessment, Ld. AO found that accounts of the assessee were voluminous and complex