BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

55 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 90clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,114Mumbai968Ahmedabad254Jaipur215Bangalore196Kolkata133Hyderabad128Chennai123Karnataka123Raipur114Indore105Pune93Chandigarh64Lucknow55Surat49Amritsar47Allahabad44Cochin41Calcutta34Visakhapatnam30Nagpur22Rajkot18Cuttack14Kerala14Patna13Agra10Dehradun9Guwahati9Jodhpur7Panaji6Ranchi6Jabalpur5Rajasthan3SC3Telangana2Varanasi1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 14263Section 27542Section 1138Natural Justice37Penalty29Addition to Income23Section 6922Section 142(1)21Limitation/Time-bar

USHA YADAV,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER RANGE 6(2), LUCKNOW

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 251/LKW/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow09 Dec 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Shri Dharmendra Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Shri R. R. N. Shukla, Addl. CIT(DR)
Section 10(37)Section 139(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 2(14)(iii)Section 271(1)(c)

90,264/-; ii. Notice of demand u/s 156 of the Act for a.y.2013-14 for a sum of Rs.5,000/-; and iii. Notice of demand u/s 156 of the Act for a.y.2013-14 for a sum of Rs.10, 000/-. g. Appellant received ‘Order u/s 271F of the Act’ on 1310-2022 at her address by “post. h. On receipt of aforesaid notices

Showing 1–20 of 55 · Page 1 of 3

21
Section 2(15)18
Survey u/s 133A17
Section 1516

USHA YADAV,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER RANGE 6(2), LUCKNOW

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 249/LKW/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow09 Dec 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Shri Dharmendra Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Shri R. R. N. Shukla, Addl. CIT(DR)
Section 10(37)Section 139(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 2(14)(iii)Section 271(1)(c)

90,264/-; ii. Notice of demand u/s 156 of the Act for a.y.2013-14 for a sum of Rs.5,000/-; and iii. Notice of demand u/s 156 of the Act for a.y.2013-14 for a sum of Rs.10, 000/-. g. Appellant received ‘Order u/s 271F of the Act’ on 1310-2022 at her address by “post. h. On receipt of aforesaid notices

M/S. CITYON INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 318/LKW/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON NANO TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 301/LKW/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 315/LKW/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 316/LKW/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON SYSTEMS (INDIA) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 312/LKW/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 317/LKW/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON NANO TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 304/LKW/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON NANO TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 300/LKW/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON SYSTEMS (INDIA) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 311/LKW/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON SYSTEMS (INIDA) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 308/LKW/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON SYSTEMS (INDIA) LTD.,DELHI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, , KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 309/LKW/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 313/LKW/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON NANO TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 299/LKW/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON SYSTEMS (INDIA) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 307/LKW/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 319/LKW/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON NANO TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 305/LKW/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON NANO TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 303/LKW/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 314/LKW/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated