Search: penalty u/s 271

5 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 80P(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Cochin21 Bangalore21 Delhi15 Jaipur11 Visakhapatnam11 Amritsar10 Chandigarh9 Mumbai9 Chennai6 Indore6 Varanasi6 Ahmedabad5 Lucknow5 Surat4 Pune3 Nagpur3 Rajkot2 Jodhpur2 Panaji1 Guwahati1 Patna1

Key Topics

Section 80P15 Section 271(1)(c)8 Section 1428 Section 80P(2)(a)6 Deduction5 Penalty5 Disallowance4 Section 2743 Section 80P(2)3

TINICH SAHKARI GANNA SAMITI LIMITED,BASTII vs. ITO, BASTI

ITA 295/LKW/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow18 Sept 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: None (Written submission)For Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma and Shri Amit Kumar, D.Rs

Section 143(3)Section 244ASection 271(1)(c)Section 28Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, separately. 2.3 Aggrieved, the Assessee preferred an appeal before the NFAC, which dismissed the appeal of the assessee on merits. 2.4 Now, the assessee has approached this Tribunal challenging the order of the NFAC by raising the following grounds of appeal: 1. Because the Id. CIT (A) has failed

TINICH SAHKARI GANNA SAMITI LIMITED,BASTII vs. ITO, BASTI

TINICH SAHKARI GANNA SAMITI LIMITED,BASTII vs. ITO, BASTI

TINICH SAHKARI GANNA SAMITI LIMITED,BASTI vs. ITO, , BASTI

CO-OPERATIVE CANE DEVELOPMENT UNION LIMITED MAHOLI AYYUBI CHAMBER, RANIGANJ, LAKHIMPUR KHERI-262001,LAKHIMPUR KHERI vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SITAPUR-NEW, SITAPUR

U.P.COOPERATIVE FEDERATIONLTD,LUCKNOW vs. ITO-2(3), , LUCKNOW

DARYABAD CO-OPERATIVE CANE DEVELOPMENT UNION LIMITED,BARABANKI vs. THE ADDL./JOINT/DEPUTY/ACIT, NFAC