HARI SINGH CHAUHAN,KANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 3(5), AAYAKAR BHAWAN
The appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 344/LKW/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow25 Aug 2025AY 2012-13
Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastavaassessment Year: 2012-13 Hari Singh Chouhan V. The Income Tax Officer 3(5) 1, Naramau Kanpur Kanpur Nagar (U.P) Tan/Pan:Askpc3749A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Srhi Rakesh Garg, Advocate Respondent By: Shri Sunil Kumar Rajwanshi, D.R. O R D E R
For Appellant: Srhi Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Rajwanshi, D.R
Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 50CSection 55A
penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) and 271F of the Act, separately.
2.2
Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the NFAC, which dismissed the appeal of the Assessee on merits.
2.3
Now, the Assessee has approached this Tribunal challenging impugned order of the NFAC by raising the following grounds of appeal:
1. Because there being no material
