Search: penalty u/s 271

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 43Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi66 Mumbai59 Raipur40 Visakhapatnam13 Indore11 Bangalore11 Jaipur10 Ahmedabad8 Nagpur7 Lucknow4 Pune4 Hyderabad3 Panaji3 Chennai2 Dehradun1 Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 253(3)4 Condonation of Delay4 Section 1323 Search & Seizure3

SRI SAINATH ASSOCIATES,LUCKNOW vs. DY.CIT-6, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 649/LKW/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 143(3)Section 253(3)

section 37(1) are satisfied, it is not proper on the part of AO to probe as to whether the expenditure was legitimate or necessary. « CIT v. Tirrihannah Co. Ltd. [(1992) 195 ITR 393 (Cal.)] Tea samples and complimentary tea distributed to th4e shareholders, I.T.A. No.649/Lkw/2024 Assessment Year:2017-18 5 directors and friends at the annual general meeting

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

ITA 349/LKW/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025

SRI SAINATH ASSOCIATES,LUCKNOW vs. DY.CIT-6, LUCKNOW

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

SRI SAINATH ASSOCIATES,LUCKNOW vs. DY.CIT-6, LUCKNOW

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW vs. RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY, GONDA U.P.