BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

36 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 275clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi442Mumbai236Jaipur128Karnataka100Raipur82Chennai79Ahmedabad77Kolkata70Bangalore60Indore57Hyderabad45Pune44Lucknow36Visakhapatnam28Cochin22Chandigarh21Cuttack19Amritsar14Kerala14Nagpur14Ranchi9Patna8Guwahati7Agra6Surat6Rajkot4Jabalpur4Dehradun3Jodhpur2Rajasthan2Telangana2SC1

Key Topics

Section 14263Section 27542Section 1132Penalty24Natural Justice22Section 142(1)21Limitation/Time-bar21Section 1516Section 2(15)16Exemption

INCOME TAX OFFICER -(EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW vs. M/S APS ACADEMY, LUCKNOW

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 470/LKW/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Smt. Alka Singh, D.RFor Respondent: Shri Rakesh Garg, Advocate
Section 268A

271(1)(a) of the Act. 10. Section 275 deals with bar of limitation for imposing penalty. Sub-section (1) of section 275 reads as under: “(1) No order imposing a penalty under this Chapter shall be passed- (a) in a case where the relevant assessment or other order is the subject matter of an appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals

INCOME TAX OFFICER -(EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW vs. M/S APS ACADEMY, LUCKNOW

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Showing 1–20 of 36 · Page 1 of 2

10
Section 143(3)9
Section 12A8
ITA 471/LKW/2017[2008-09]Status: Disposed
ITAT Lucknow
20 Sept 2019
AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Smt. Alka Singh, D.RFor Respondent: Shri Rakesh Garg, Advocate
Section 268A

271(1)(a) of the Act. 10. Section 275 deals with bar of limitation for imposing penalty. Sub-section (1) of section 275 reads as under: “(1) No order imposing a penalty under this Chapter shall be passed- (a) in a case where the relevant assessment or other order is the subject matter of an appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals

M/S. CITYON NANO TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 302/LKW/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON SYSTEMS (INDIA) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 312/LKW/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 313/LKW/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 315/LKW/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 316/LKW/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 317/LKW/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON NANO TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 301/LKW/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON NANO TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 305/LKW/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON NANO TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 299/LKW/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 319/LKW/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 318/LKW/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 314/LKW/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON SYSTEMS (INDIA) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 310/LKW/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON SYSTEMS (INDIA) LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 306/LKW/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON NANO TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 300/LKW/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON NANO TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 303/LKW/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON NANO TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 304/LKW/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated

M/S. CITYON SYSTEMS (INDIA) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 307/LKW/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

section 275 of the Act, 1961, by passing the I.T.A. No.299 to 319/Lkw/2020 Assessment Year:2010-11 to 2016-17 4 penalty order and imposing a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- before the disposal of the appeal of the relevant assessment order.” 3. The appeal in I.T.A. No.299/Lkw/2020 for assessment year 2010-11 has arisen from common appellate order dated