MOHAMMAD FAHEEM,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, RANGE (I), LUCKNOW
In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 238/LKW/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow23 May 2025AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudharyassessment Year: 2014-15 Mohammad Faheem V. The Income Tax Officer Shan Timber Broker & Supplier Range 4(1) 268/122, Master Kanhaya Lal Road Lucknow Aishbagh, Lucknow Tan/Pan:Abipf8034C (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Hri Rohit Bhalla, C.A. Respondent By: Shri Sunil Kumar Rajwanshi, D.R. Date Of Hearing: 22 05 2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 23 05 2025 O R D E R
For Appellant: hri Rohit Bhalla, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Rajwanshi, D.R
Section 115BSection 144Section 147Section 148Section 69Section 69A
penalty proceedings under sections 271F and 271(1)(c) of the Act, separately.
3. Aggrieved, the Assessee preferred an appeal before the NFAC, which dismissed the appeal of the assessee for the reason of non-compliance by the Assessee.
4. Now, the Assessee has approached this Tribunal challenging the orders of the AO as well as NFAC by raising
