Search: penalty u/s 271

6 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 270A(2)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 14719 Section 41(1)8 Section 271(1)(c)6 Section 143(3)5 Section 69C5 Section 684 Section 143(2)3 Section 1513 Reassessment

DILEEP KUMAR OJHA,SITAPUR vs. NFAC DELHI, DELHI

In the result, these appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 453/LKW/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow27 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sudhhanshu Srivastava & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

For Appellant: Shri Ravinder Aggarwal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl

Section 147Section 148Section 234ASection 249(3)Section 270ASection 271(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)Section 69Section 69C

b) and 271(1)(c).” ITA. No.459/LKW/2024 1. On facts and circumstances of the case, the order passed by Ld. Authorities below u/s 147 r.w.s 144 is bad in law and without jurisdiction and needs be quashed as the same is passed before service of notice u/s 148. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the order passed

DILEEP KUMAR OJHA,SITAPUR vs. NFAC DELHI, DELHI

DILEEP KUMAR OJHA,SITAPUR vs. NFAC DELHI, DELHI

M/S FIVE ROSES,KANPUR vs. DY, CIT-CC-1, KANPUR

M/S FIVE ROSES,KANPUR vs. J/DCIT-CC,, KANPUR

M/S FIVE ROSES,KANPUR vs. DY, CIT-CC-1, KANPUR

MOHD. ASFAND AKHTAR,KANPUR vs. DEPUTI COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CC-2, KANPUR

DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CC-2,, KANPUR vs. SHRI.MOHAMMAD ASFAND AKHTAR, KANPUR