64 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 250(4)clear
Sorted by relevance
Key Topics
Showing 1–20 of 64 · Page 1 of 4
Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor
4), Chennai, 93 taxmann.com 250 (Madras), wherein the penalty levied I.T.A. Nos.265 to 270/Lkw/2019 Assessment Years:2002-03 to 2007-08 3 u/s 271(1)(c) has been upheld. Learned D. R. drew our specific attention to the decision of Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Sundaram Finance Ltd. (supra) wherein the issue of striking