Search: penalty u/s 271

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 246Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Indore51 Jaipur39 Chennai29 Delhi19 Pune18 Mumbai16 Hyderabad15 Panaji13 Chandigarh10 Raipur9 Patna7 Bangalore6 Ahmedabad6 Visakhapatnam5 Lucknow4 Nagpur3 Amritsar3 Kolkata3 Guwahati2 Jodhpur2 Cochin2 Rajkot2 Agra1

Key Topics

Section 14715 Section 143(2)3 Section 143(3)3 Section 1513 Section 292C3 Section 153C3 Section 2713 Section 271F3 Reassessment3

M/S FIVE ROSES,KANPUR vs. DY, CIT-CC-1, KANPUR

In the result, all the three appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 271/LKW/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow05 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

For Appellant: Shri Pradeep Kapoor, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, D.R

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 151Section 153CSection 292C

271(1)(c) of the Act. 8. BECAUSE the order appealed against is contrary to facts, law and principles of natural justice. 9. BECAUSE each ground taken in appeal is mutually exclusive and without prejudice to each other. 10. The "appellant" craves leave, to add, delete or modify any of the grounds before hearing of appeal. ITA No.273/LKW/2024: 1.1. BECAUSE

M/S FIVE ROSES,KANPUR vs. DY, CIT-CC-1, KANPUR

M/S FIVE ROSES,KANPUR vs. DY, CIT-CC-1, KANPUR

M/S FIVE ROSES,KANPUR vs. J/DCIT-CC,, KANPUR

M/S FIVE ROSES,KANPUR vs. DY, CIT-CC-1, KANPUR

M/S DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,BARABANKI vs. JOINT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (I& CI ), LUCKNOW