GAGAN PREET KAUR VIRDI,LUCKNOW vs. ITO-6(2), LUCKNOW-NEW
In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes and the Stay Application is dismissed as infructuous
ITA 290/LKW/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Jun 2024AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria
Section 131Section 142Section 147Section 151Section 69A
1A) of the Act, as per mandate of sub-section (3) of section 142 of the Act.
WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO THE AFORESAID
5. BECAUSE the ld."CIT(A)" has erred in law and on facts in confirming the addition of Rs.1,25,00,000/- made by Assessing Officer by erroneously treating the loan received by the appellant from the lender
