Search: penalty u/s 271

5 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 148Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai63 Delhi37 Rajkot31 Jaipur26 Surat14 Ahmedabad13 Indore13 Kolkata12 Pune12 Chennai11 Hyderabad8 Nagpur7 Visakhapatnam7 Chandigarh7 Raipur5 Lucknow5 Bangalore5 Cuttack2 Amritsar2 Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 1476 Section 69A4 Condonation of Delay4 Section 1483 Section 253(3)3 Section 1323 Search & Seizure3 Section 1442 Section 148A2

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW vs. SUDHANSHU TRIVEDI, LUCKNOW

ITA 418/LKW/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudharyassessment Year: 2015-16 The Acit V. Sudhanshu Trivedi Lucknow 21/1013, Sector 21 Indira Nagar, Lucknow (U.P) Tan/Pan:Ackpt4164G (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Amit Singh Chouhan, D.R. Respondent By: S/Shri Rajat Jain & Akshat Jain, Cas O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Amit Singh Chouhan, D.RFor Respondent: S/Shri Rajat Jain and Akshat Jain, CAs

Section 10(38)Section 115BSection 143(1)(a)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 149Section 271(1)(c)

penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, separately. 2.2 Aggrieved, the Assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. First Appellate Authority. The main issued raised before the Ld. First Appellate Authority was with respect to the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated by the AO under section 147 of the Act. The Ld. First Appellate Authority passed

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW vs. SUDHANSHU TRIVEDI, LUCKNOW

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW vs. SUDHANSHU TRIVEDI, LUCKNOW

SANT HARAJINDAR SINGH,PILIBHIT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICERITO-2(4), PILIBHIT-1, PILIBHIT

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW vs. RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY, GONDA U.P.