Search: penalty u/s 271

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 140Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Hyderabad21 Amritsar10 Mumbai8 Chandigarh3 Chennai2 Pune2 Raipur2 Lucknow2 Delhi2

Key Topics

Section 1476 Section 69A4 Section 69C4 Section 271(1)(c)4 Section 133(6)2 Section 1442 Unexplained Money2 Exemption2 Penalty2

REETA DEVI,BANNAMAU LALGANJ RAEBARELI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, RAEBARELI

In the result, both the appeals are treated as allowed, for statistical purposes

ITA 440/LKW/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow24 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Rajwanshi, D.R

Section 133(6)Section 144Section 147Section 271(1)(c)Section 69ASection 69C

penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. However, both the appeals before the NFAC came to be dismissed for the reason of delay in filing of the appeals before the NFAC. 6. Now, the assessee has approached this Tribunal challenging the dismissal of his appeals by the NFAC by raising the following grounds of appeals: GROUNDS

REETA DEVI,BANNAMAU LALGANJ RAEBARELI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, RAEBARELI

REETA DEVI,BANNAMAU LALGANJ RAEBARELI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, RAEBARELI

REETA DEVI,BANNA MAU LALGANJ RAEBARELI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS) INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, RAEBARELI