BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 132Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi190Mumbai157Jaipur121Hyderabad59Chennai38Pune28Bangalore27Chandigarh26Ahmedabad25Allahabad23Agra16Rajkot15Guwahati12Raipur11Surat11Lucknow11Visakhapatnam8Cuttack8Nagpur8Indore4Amritsar3SC3Cochin3Kolkata3Karnataka2Gauhati1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 6921Search & Seizure10Section 132A8Addition to Income8Section 133A7Unexplained Investment7Survey u/s 133A7Undisclosed Income7Natural Justice

SHRI VINAY PRATAP SINGH,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-6(5), LUCKNOW

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 332/LKW/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow29 Nov 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 132ASection 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 158BSection 271(1)(c)Section 274

132A of the Act, in the case of Shri Shafaat Ezaj Siddiqui and Tabish Mansoor, information was provided by ATS regarding various bank accounts in the name of Shri Vinay Pratap Singh, the assessee. The Assessing Officer made addition of cash deposit of Rs.5,92,724/- in the assessee’s bank account i.e. S.B.A/c No.84822200014042 with Syndicate Bank, Indira Nagar

7
Section 271(1)(c)5
Section 253(3)3
Section 1323

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW vs. RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY, GONDA U.P.

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

ITA 460/LKW/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 132Section 253(3)

u/s 50C/142A in response to which Valuation Officer, Allahabad has estimated the FMV of lease property as on 04/10/2013 at Rs. 43,46,000/- against actual consideration of Rs. 31,45,000/- vide valuation report dt. 14/06/2024. The relevant para of Assessment Order is as under: 7. During the year under consideration, the assessee was found to have purchased

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

ITA 349/LKW/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 132Section 253(3)

u/s 50C/142A in response to which Valuation Officer, Allahabad has estimated the FMV of lease property as on 04/10/2013 at Rs. 43,46,000/- against actual consideration of Rs. 31,45,000/- vide valuation report dt. 14/06/2024. The relevant para of Assessment Order is as under: 7. During the year under consideration, the assessee was found to have purchased

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

ITA 351/LKW/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 132Section 253(3)

u/s 50C/142A in response to which Valuation Officer, Allahabad has estimated the FMV of lease property as on 04/10/2013 at Rs. 43,46,000/- against actual consideration of Rs. 31,45,000/- vide valuation report dt. 14/06/2024. The relevant para of Assessment Order is as under: 7. During the year under consideration, the assessee was found to have purchased

(SMT.) ANJU SINGH,LUCKNOW vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals for assessment year 2003-04 to 2008-09

ITA 390/LKW/2014[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Mar 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri. T.S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S. K. Madhuk, CIT (DR)
Section 132ASection 133ASection 69

132A of the Act was carried out on Harsingar Gutkha/Patel group of cases on 19/11/2008 and several commercial and residential premises of the assessee were covered under this operation. Simultaneously, survey proceedings under section 133A of the Act were also carried out at many places belonging to the assessee group and its business associates. As a result of search/survey operations

(SMT.) ANJU SINGH,LUCKNOW vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals for assessment year 2003-04 to 2008-09

ITA 392/LKW/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Mar 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri. T.S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S. K. Madhuk, CIT (DR)
Section 132ASection 133ASection 69

132A of the Act was carried out on Harsingar Gutkha/Patel group of cases on 19/11/2008 and several commercial and residential premises of the assessee were covered under this operation. Simultaneously, survey proceedings under section 133A of the Act were also carried out at many places belonging to the assessee group and its business associates. As a result of search/survey operations

(SMT.) ANJU SINGH,LUCKNOW vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals for assessment year 2003-04 to 2008-09

ITA 394/LKW/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Mar 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri. T.S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S. K. Madhuk, CIT (DR)
Section 132ASection 133ASection 69

132A of the Act was carried out on Harsingar Gutkha/Patel group of cases on 19/11/2008 and several commercial and residential premises of the assessee were covered under this operation. Simultaneously, survey proceedings under section 133A of the Act were also carried out at many places belonging to the assessee group and its business associates. As a result of search/survey operations

(SMT.) ANJU SINGH,LUCKNOW vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals for assessment year 2003-04 to 2008-09

ITA 396/LKW/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Mar 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri. T.S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S. K. Madhuk, CIT (DR)
Section 132ASection 133ASection 69

132A of the Act was carried out on Harsingar Gutkha/Patel group of cases on 19/11/2008 and several commercial and residential premises of the assessee were covered under this operation. Simultaneously, survey proceedings under section 133A of the Act were also carried out at many places belonging to the assessee group and its business associates. As a result of search/survey operations

(SMT.) ANJU SINGH,LUCKNOW vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals for assessment year 2003-04 to 2008-09

ITA 391/LKW/2014[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Mar 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri. T.S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S. K. Madhuk, CIT (DR)
Section 132ASection 133ASection 69

132A of the Act was carried out on Harsingar Gutkha/Patel group of cases on 19/11/2008 and several commercial and residential premises of the assessee were covered under this operation. Simultaneously, survey proceedings under section 133A of the Act were also carried out at many places belonging to the assessee group and its business associates. As a result of search/survey operations

(SMT.) ANJU SINGH,LUCKNOW vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals for assessment year 2003-04 to 2008-09

ITA 395/LKW/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Mar 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri. T.S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S. K. Madhuk, CIT (DR)
Section 132ASection 133ASection 69

132A of the Act was carried out on Harsingar Gutkha/Patel group of cases on 19/11/2008 and several commercial and residential premises of the assessee were covered under this operation. Simultaneously, survey proceedings under section 133A of the Act were also carried out at many places belonging to the assessee group and its business associates. As a result of search/survey operations

(SMT.) ANJU SINGH,LUCKNOW vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals for assessment year 2003-04 to 2008-09

ITA 393/LKW/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Mar 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri. T.S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S. K. Madhuk, CIT (DR)
Section 132ASection 133ASection 69

132A of the Act was carried out on Harsingar Gutkha/Patel group of cases on 19/11/2008 and several commercial and residential premises of the assessee were covered under this operation. Simultaneously, survey proceedings under section 133A of the Act were also carried out at many places belonging to the assessee group and its business associates. As a result of search/survey operations