BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

49 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Search & Seizureclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,116Mumbai833Jaipur324Kolkata202Hyderabad197Pune184Indore165Bangalore147Surat122Karnataka103Chennai99Ahmedabad71Chandigarh60Rajkot54Lucknow49Cuttack48Allahabad40Visakhapatnam38Guwahati32Amritsar29Nagpur29Patna26Raipur24Agra15Cochin15Ranchi15Jodhpur9Jabalpur5SC3Dehradun3Punjab & Haryana2Calcutta1Rajasthan1Telangana1Varanasi1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 14263Section 27542Section 1132Natural Justice31Penalty28Section 6923Limitation/Time-bar23Section 142(1)21Survey u/s 133A

M/S. CITYON INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 314/LKW/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961(hereinafter called “the Act”) imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the assessee. 4. The brief facts of the case are that a search & seizure

M/S. CITYON SYSTEMS (INDIA) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 310/LKW/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow

Showing 1–20 of 49 · Page 1 of 3

18
Section 271(1)(c)17
Section 1516
Section 2(15)16
20 Oct 2022
AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961(hereinafter called “the Act”) imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the assessee. 4. The brief facts of the case are that a search & seizure

M/S. CITYON NANO TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 305/LKW/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961(hereinafter called “the Act”) imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the assessee. 4. The brief facts of the case are that a search & seizure

M/S. CITYON INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 318/LKW/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961(hereinafter called “the Act”) imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the assessee. 4. The brief facts of the case are that a search & seizure

M/S. CITYON INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 319/LKW/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961(hereinafter called “the Act”) imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the assessee. 4. The brief facts of the case are that a search & seizure

M/S. CITYON INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 316/LKW/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961(hereinafter called “the Act”) imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the assessee. 4. The brief facts of the case are that a search & seizure

M/S. CITYON NANO TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 301/LKW/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961(hereinafter called “the Act”) imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the assessee. 4. The brief facts of the case are that a search & seizure

M/S. CITYON INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 317/LKW/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961(hereinafter called “the Act”) imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the assessee. 4. The brief facts of the case are that a search & seizure

M/S. CITYON SYSTEMS (INDIA) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 307/LKW/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961(hereinafter called “the Act”) imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the assessee. 4. The brief facts of the case are that a search & seizure

M/S. CITYON NANO TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 299/LKW/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961(hereinafter called “the Act”) imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the assessee. 4. The brief facts of the case are that a search & seizure

M/S. CITYON SYSTEMS (INDIA) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 312/LKW/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961(hereinafter called “the Act”) imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the assessee. 4. The brief facts of the case are that a search & seizure

M/S. CITYON SYSTEMS (INDIA) LTD.,DELHI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, , KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 309/LKW/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961(hereinafter called “the Act”) imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the assessee. 4. The brief facts of the case are that a search & seizure

M/S. CITYON SYSTEMS (INDIA) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 311/LKW/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961(hereinafter called “the Act”) imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the assessee. 4. The brief facts of the case are that a search & seizure

M/S. CITYON INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 315/LKW/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961(hereinafter called “the Act”) imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the assessee. 4. The brief facts of the case are that a search & seizure

M/S. CITYON SYSTEMS (INIDA) LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 308/LKW/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961(hereinafter called “the Act”) imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the assessee. 4. The brief facts of the case are that a search & seizure

M/S. CITYON NANO TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 303/LKW/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961(hereinafter called “the Act”) imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the assessee. 4. The brief facts of the case are that a search & seizure

M/S. CITYON INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 313/LKW/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961(hereinafter called “the Act”) imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the assessee. 4. The brief facts of the case are that a search & seizure

M/S. CITYON NANO TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 304/LKW/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961(hereinafter called “the Act”) imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the assessee. 4. The brief facts of the case are that a search & seizure

M/S. CITYON NANO TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 300/LKW/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961(hereinafter called “the Act”) imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the assessee. 4. The brief facts of the case are that a search & seizure

M/S. CITYON SYSTEMS (INDIA) LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. THE DCIT, CC-I, KANPUR

In the result , all the seven appeal’s in ITA no

ITA 306/LKW/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow20 Oct 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 142Section 142(1)Section 275

u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961(hereinafter called “the Act”) imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the assessee. 4. The brief facts of the case are that a search & seizure