Search: penalty u/s 271

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Demonetizationclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur33 Hyderabad32 Chennai22 Bangalore16 Delhi13 Mumbai9 Ahmedabad9 Indore7 Visakhapatnam4 Surat4 Kolkata4 Rajkot3 Jodhpur2 Chandigarh2 Lucknow2 Patna2 Raipur2 Cochin1 Panaji1 Agra1 Pune1

Key Topics

Section 1444 Section 69A4 Section 115B2 Cash Deposit2 Demonetization2 Penalty2 Natural Justice2

NITIN DWIVEDI,HARDOI vs. CIT(A), HARDOI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 362/LKW/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudharyassessment Year: 2017-18 Nitin Dwivedi V. The Ito – 3(3) Avas Vikas Colony Hardoi Prahladpuri, Hardoi (U.P) Tan/Pan:Ajfpd9057Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: None Respondent By: Shri R.R.N. Shukla, D.R. O R D E R

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri R.R.N. Shukla, D.R

Section 115BSection 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 250(6)Section 271ASection 69A

demonetization he had deposited all the cash in his limit account and FD. The AO also obtained bank account statements for the financial years 2015-16 and 2016-17 from the respective banks under section 133(6) of the Act. However, the AO observed that the assessee had made cash deposits of Rs.19,18,000/- during the year under consideration

NITIN DWIVEDI,HARDOI vs. CIT(A), HARDOI

NITIN DWIVEDI,HARDOI vs. CIT(A), HARDOI

VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA,SIDDHARTH NAGAR vs. ACIT, GONDA