Search: house property

4 results for “house property”+ Section 69Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 41(1)8 Section 684 Section 69C4 Disallowance3 Addition to Income3 Section 412 Section 372 Section 143(3)2 Section 36(1)(va)2 Survey u/s 133A

ACIT(E), LUCKNOW vs. M/S. BHAGWANT INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, BIJNOR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 219/LKW/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow31 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

For Appellant: \nShri R. K. Agarwal CIT(DR)For Respondent: \nShri Vinod Kumar, CA

Section 11Section 143(2)

houses. They do not gene,\nWealth, they cannot survive without public funds or private aid. It is said\nthere restraint on collection of students fees. With the restraint on\ncollection, the minorities cannot be saddled with the burden of maintain,\neducational institutions without grant-in-aid. They do not have advantage\nover others. It is not. possible to have educational

M/S. SAHARA CITY HOMES,BAREILLY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER - 3(4), RANGE- 3, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed

ACIT(E), LUCKNOW vs. M/S. BHAGWANT INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, BIJNOR

M/S. SAHARA CITY HOMES,BAREILLY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER - 3(4), RANGE- 3, LUCKNOW

ACIT(E), LUCKNOW vs. M/S. BHAGWANT INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, BIJNOR

M/S. SAHARA CITY HOMES,BAREILLY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER - 3(4), RANGE- 3, LUCKNOW

DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CC-2,, KANPUR vs. SHRI.MOHAMMAD ASFAND AKHTAR, KANPUR

MOHD. ASFAND AKHTAR,KANPUR vs. DEPUTI COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CC-2, KANPUR