Search: house property

4 results for “house property”+ Section 270A(8)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi124 Mumbai100 Chandigarh52 Jaipur35 Bangalore33 Chennai31 Hyderabad23 Ahmedabad21 Pune14 Indore13 Kolkata10 Nagpur8 Rajkot5 Visakhapatnam5 Surat5 Lucknow4 Raipur3 Amritsar2 Patna2 Guwahati2

Key Topics

Section 41(1)8 Section 69A6 Section 684 Section 69C4 Addition to Income4 Disallowance3 Section 2742 Section 412 Section 372 Section 143(3)

SHAILENDRA KUMAR SINGH ,HARDOI vs. ITO-3(2),HARDOI-1, HARDOI

In the result, these appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 795/LKW/2024[2021-2022]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow24 Feb 2025AY 2021-2022

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshrait(Ss) A. Nos. 795 To 798/Lkw/2024 Assessment Year: 2021-22 Shailendra Kumar Singh Ito-3(2) V. Subhan Khera Sandila, Hardoi- Hardoi-1 241305. Uttar Pradesh-241305. Pan:Cvqps4275L (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellants By: Shri Naeem Khan, Ca Respondent By: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl. Cit(Dr) O R D E R

For Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl

House Property’. In support of this assertion, a Interest Certificate has been included. d) Disallowance of Rs 30,614/was made on account of disallowance of deduction under chapter V1-A Actual Facts: The claim referenced above is valid, and supporting documentation has been included for your reference. c) An addition of Rs 7,54,892/was made with respect to agricultural

MR.BHUPENDRA KUMAR TIWARI,GONDA vs. ITO-6(1), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

SHAILENDRA KUMAR SINGH ,HARDOI vs. ITO-3(2),HARDOI-1, HARDOI

MR.BHUPENDRA KUMAR TIWARI,GONDA vs. ITO-6(1), LUCKNOW

SHAILENDRA KUMAR SINGH ,HARDOI vs. ITO-3(2),HARDOI-1, HARDOI

MR.BHUPENDRA KUMAR TIWARI,GONDA vs. ITO-6(1), LUCKNOW

MOHD. ASFAND AKHTAR,KANPUR vs. DEPUTI COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CC-2, KANPUR

DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CC-2,, KANPUR vs. SHRI.MOHAMMAD ASFAND AKHTAR, KANPUR