BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “house property”+ Section 249clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai241Delhi201Chandigarh54Jaipur54Bangalore51Amritsar34Pune20Indore14Raipur14Chennai14Ahmedabad12Hyderabad11Cochin10Visakhapatnam7Patna7Rajkot6Kolkata6SC4Surat2Lucknow2Nagpur1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 686Section 115B2Section 143(2)2Cash Deposit2Addition to Income2

SHAILENDRA KUMAR SINGH ,HARDOI vs. ITO-3(2),HARDOI-1, HARDOI

In the result, these appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 795/LKW/2024[2021-2022]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow24 Feb 2025AY 2021-2022

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshrait(Ss) A. Nos. 795 To 798/Lkw/2024 Assessment Year: 2021-22 Shailendra Kumar Singh Ito-3(2) V. Subhan Khera Sandila, Hardoi- Hardoi-1 241305. Uttar Pradesh-241305. Pan:Cvqps4275L (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellants By: Shri Naeem Khan, Ca Respondent By: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl. Cit(Dr) O R D E R

For Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl

House Property’. In support of this assertion, a Interest Certificate has been included. d) Disallowance of Rs 30,614/was made on account of disallowance of deduction under chapter V1-A Actual Facts: The claim referenced above is valid, and supporting documentation has been included for your reference. c) An addition of Rs 7,54,892/was made with respect to agricultural

KASHI NATH SETH SARRAF PRIVATE LIMITED,HARDOI vs. ACIT, SITAPUR, SITAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

ITA 88/LKW/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed
ITAT Lucknow
22 Sept 2025
AY 2017-18
Section 115BSection 143(2)Section 145(3)Section 234BSection 44Section 68

249 : (1998) 229 I.T.R. 383\n(SC), C.I.T. Vs. Rayala Corporation (P)\nLimited (1995) 215 I.T.R. 883(Madras)\nand C.I.T. Vs. Bhopal Sugar Industries\n(1997), 143 C.T.R. (M.P.) 240; (1998) 233\nI.T.R. 429 (M.P.) relied on.\n\n(B) In this case assessment order dated 30/12/2019 was passed u/s\n143(3) of the Act wherein the assessee's total