BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “disallowance”+ Section 54F(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi124Mumbai96Chennai56Ahmedabad41Hyderabad33Jaipur28Pune23Bangalore22Kolkata20Indore18Surat17Visakhapatnam16Nagpur10Lucknow9Raipur8Patna7Cochin7Chandigarh7Rajkot7Jodhpur6Cuttack5Dehradun2Jabalpur2Amritsar1SC1Allahabad1Varanasi1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 145(3)14Section 54F8Section 696Deduction5Section 253(3)4Section 142(1)4Condonation of Delay4Disallowance4Addition to Income4Section 132

AYYUB JAFRI,LUCKNOW vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 177/LKW/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Sept 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Kumar, DR
Section 143(3)Section 54FSection 80J

section 54F. The ld. AO pointed out to the assessee that additional documents were required to examine the claim such as sale / purchase deeds, documents in support of claimed costs of improvement, evidence of deposit of sale consideration into capital gain accounts, bills and vouchers pertaining to cost of house constructed by you, details of parties to whom payments were

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT, (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

3
Search & Seizure3
House Property3
ITA 352/LKW/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2019-20
Section 145(3)Section 54FSection 69

54F\nof Income Tax Act, 1961.\n\nI.T.A. No.608/Lkw/2024, A.Y. 2020-21 (Revenue’s Appeal)\n\n1. Whether on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in\ndeleting the addition of Rs.93,93,846/- on account of applying NP rate @ 11% on\ntotal turnover after rejecting the book result shown, in section

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

ITA 353/LKW/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2022-23
Section 145(3)Section 54FSection 69

54F \nof Income Tax Act, 1961. \n\n6. Whether on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in \ndeleting the addition of Rs.1,00,000/- in respect of gift received from father Shri \nSurya Narayan Pandey without appreciating the fact that the assessee has not \nproduced any documentary evidence in support of his claim

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

ITA 348/LKW/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2015-16
Section 145(3)Section 54FSection 69

54F\nof Income Tax Act, 1961.\n\nI.T.A. No.608/Lkw/2024, A.Y. 2020-21 (Revenue’s Appeal)\n\n4. Whether on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in\ndeleting the addition of Rs.1,74,492/- on account of applying NP rate @ 11% on\ntotal turnover, after rejecting the book result shown, as per section

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

ITA 349/LKW/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 132Section 253(3)

54F of the Act. The Ld. CIT(A) considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in accordance with law has allowed the appeal. Issue No. 11 – AY 2021-22 Addition due to Non deduction of TDS on payment of Rs. 3074000 @ 30% i.e. 922200/- in violation of the provision of section 40a(ia) In relevant year

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

ITA 351/LKW/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 132Section 253(3)

54F of the Act. The Ld. CIT(A) considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in accordance with law has allowed the appeal. Issue No. 11 – AY 2021-22 Addition due to Non deduction of TDS on payment of Rs. 3074000 @ 30% i.e. 922200/- in violation of the provision of section 40a(ia) In relevant year

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW vs. RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY, GONDA U.P.

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

ITA 460/LKW/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 132Section 253(3)

54F of the Act. The Ld. CIT(A) considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in accordance with law has allowed the appeal. Issue No. 11 – AY 2021-22 Addition due to Non deduction of TDS on payment of Rs. 3074000 @ 30% i.e. 922200/- in violation of the provision of section 40a(ia) In relevant year

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW vs. RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY, GONDA UP

ITA 398/LKW/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2015-16
Section 145(3)Section 54FSection 69

54F\nof Income Tax Act, 1961.\nI.T.A. No.608/Lkw/2024, A.Y. 2020-21 (Revenue’s Appeal)\n1. Whether on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in\ndeleting the addition of Rs.1,45,53,688/- on account of applying NP rate @ 11% on\ntotal turnover after rejecting the book result shown, in section

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT(CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

ITA 350/LKW/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2017-18
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 250Section 253(3)

54F of the Act. The Ld. CIT(A)\nconsidering the facts and circumstances of the case and in accordance with\nlaw has allowed the appeal.\nIssue No. 11 – AY 2021-22\nAddition due to Non deduction of TDS on payment of Rs.3074000\n@ 30% i.e. 922200/- in violation of the provision of section\n40a(ia)\nIn relevant year