BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 194A(3)(v)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai109Chennai36Chandigarh32Bangalore28Delhi23Jaipur21Ahmedabad20Pune20Rajkot18Hyderabad14Surat13Visakhapatnam9Kolkata9Nagpur9Cuttack5Cochin5Jodhpur5Raipur4Allahabad3Lucknow3Ranchi3SC2Indore1Jabalpur1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)16Section 2638Section 197A3Addition to Income3Section 197A(2)2Section 201(1)2Revision u/s 2632

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6, LUCKNOW vs. M/S. U.P. STATE CONSTRUCTION & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED, LUCKNOW

ITA 617/LKW/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow28 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 251Section 263

v. Shreeji Prints (P.) Ltd., 5. The Tribunal has found that in the order passed by the PCIT, Explanation 2 of section 263 of the Act, 1961 is made applicable. The Tribunal observed that the PCIT has not mentioned in the show cause notice to invoke the Explanation 2 of section 263 of the Act 1961. Therefore, by invocation

U.P SAMAJ KALYAN NIRMAN NIGAM LIMITED (NOW KNOWN AS U.P STATE CONSTRUCTION AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.),LUCKNOW vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, LUCKNOW

ITA 67/LKW/2016[2011-12]Status: Disposed
ITAT Lucknow
28 Nov 2025
AY 2011-12
Section 143(3)Section 2Section 263

v. Shreeji Prints (P.) Ltd.,\n5. The Tribunal has found that in the order passed by the PCIT, Explanation 2 of\nSection 263 of the Act, 1961 is made applicable. The Tribunal observed that the\nPCIT has not mentioned in the show cause notice to invoke the Explanation 2 of\nsection 263 of the Act 1961. Therefore, by invocation

M/S. DISTRICT COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, BAREILLY

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 346/LKW/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow30 Sept 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudharya.Y. 2012-13 M/S District Cooperative Bank Deputy Commissioner Of Limited, Near Civil Court Road, Vs. Income Tax, Circle-I, Bareilly Shahjahanpur, U.P. Pan:Aaaad8759N (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sh. B.P. Yadav, Adv Revenue By: Sh. Amit Singh Chauhan, Jcit Date Of Hearing: 13.08.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 30.09.2024 O R D E R

For Appellant: Sh. B.P. Yadav, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Singh Chauhan, JCIT
Section 197ASection 197A(2)Section 201(1)Section 250Section 40

disallowed a sum of such interest payments amounting to Rs.1,01,60,707/- under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. 3. Aggrieved with the said order, the assessee went in appeal before the ld. CIT(A). Before the ld. CIT(A), it was submitted that all the branches of the bank were situated in remote rural areas