BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 194Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai250Delhi159Bangalore143Kolkata89Chennai84Pune50Hyderabad46Chandigarh36Ahmedabad33Jaipur27Visakhapatnam24Rajkot22Surat19Cuttack16Raipur14Nagpur12Cochin10Jodhpur8Amritsar7Indore4Ranchi4Allahabad3Karnataka3Lucknow3Panaji3Patna2SC2Guwahati2Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)16Section 2638Section 197A3Addition to Income3Section 197A(2)2Section 201(1)2Revision u/s 2632

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6, LUCKNOW vs. M/S. U.P. STATE CONSTRUCTION & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED, LUCKNOW

ITA 617/LKW/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow28 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 251Section 263

194A of the Income Tax Act, TDS is not deductible on savings bank interest because balance in the savings bank account is not treated as security but the provision of this section applies only to the interest earned on FDR's which is treated as security on which TDS is deducted by bank. The same accounting policy; and practice

M/S. DISTRICT COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, BAREILLY

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 346/LKW/2019[2012-13]Status: Disposed
ITAT Lucknow
30 Sept 2024
AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudharya.Y. 2012-13 M/S District Cooperative Bank Deputy Commissioner Of Limited, Near Civil Court Road, Vs. Income Tax, Circle-I, Bareilly Shahjahanpur, U.P. Pan:Aaaad8759N (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sh. B.P. Yadav, Adv Revenue By: Sh. Amit Singh Chauhan, Jcit Date Of Hearing: 13.08.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 30.09.2024 O R D E R

For Appellant: Sh. B.P. Yadav, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Amit Singh Chauhan, JCIT
Section 197ASection 197A(2)Section 201(1)Section 250Section 40

disallowed a sum of such interest payments amounting to Rs.1,01,60,707/- under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. 3. Aggrieved with the said order, the assessee went in appeal before the ld. CIT(A). Before the ld. CIT(A), it was submitted that all the branches of the bank were situated in remote rural areas

U.P SAMAJ KALYAN NIRMAN NIGAM LIMITED (NOW KNOWN AS U.P STATE CONSTRUCTION AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.),LUCKNOW vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, LUCKNOW

ITA 67/LKW/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow28 Nov 2025AY 2011-12
Section 143(3)Section 2Section 263

194A of\nthe Income Tax Act, TDS is not deductible on savings bank interest because\nbalance in the savings bank account is not treated as security but the provision\nof this section applies only to the interest earned on FDR's which is treated as\nsecurity on which TDS is deducted by bank. The same accounting policy; and\npractice