BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 145Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai325Delhi86Cochin59Kolkata45Bangalore41Ahmedabad35Chennai34Chandigarh29Hyderabad19Surat9Jaipur8Lucknow5Raipur5Pune4Indore4Karnataka2Cuttack1Kerala1Panaji1Patna1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 145A10Addition to Income5Section 43B4Section 133(6)2

KISAN SAHKARI CHINI MILLS LTD.,PILIBHIT vs. ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BAREILLY

In the result, all the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 774/LKW/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow07 Apr 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri A.D Jain & Shri T.S. Kapoor

Section 145A

section 145A of the IT Act, w.e.f. 1.4.1999 closing stock valuation should be inclusive of Excise Duty. The appellant has not added the excise duty in the closing stock. In this proceeding also the appellant has not produced any evidence to establish that excise duty was a part of closing stock. That AO has made a categorical finding that excise

KISAN SAHKARI CHINI MILLS LTD.,PILIBHIT vs. ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BAREILLY

In the result, all the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 775/LKW/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow07 Apr 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri A.D Jain & Shri T.S. Kapoor

Section 145A

section 145A of the IT Act, w.e.f. 1.4.1999 closing stock valuation should be inclusive of Excise Duty. The appellant has not added the excise duty in the closing stock. In this proceeding also the appellant has not produced any evidence to establish that excise duty was a part of closing stock. That AO has made a categorical finding that excise

KISAN SAHKARI CHINI MILLS LTD.,PILIBHIT vs. ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BAREILLY

In the result, all the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 776/LKW/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow07 Apr 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri A.D Jain & Shri T.S. Kapoor

Section 145A

section 145A of the IT Act, w.e.f. 1.4.1999 closing stock valuation should be inclusive of Excise Duty. The appellant has not added the excise duty in the closing stock. In this proceeding also the appellant has not produced any evidence to establish that excise duty was a part of closing stock. That AO has made a categorical finding that excise

BHAWANI DEVELOPERS,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-4(1), LUCKNOW-NEW, LUCKNOW-NEW

Appeal is disposed of in accordance with the aforesaid\ndirections

ITA 253/LKW/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow09 Oct 2025AY 2018-19
Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 144BSection 147Section 68

disallowed u/s 43B of the Act and added to your total income for\nΑ.Υ. 2018-19.\"\n3.3.5 In response, the assessee vide its submission dated 21/03/2023 has submitted as\nunder,\n\"9.2\nThe assessee begs to object to the proposed dis-allowance for the\nreason that the provisions of section 43B of the Act are not attracted

KISAN SAHKARI CHINI MILLS LIMITED ,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 758/LKW/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Aug 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguriaassessment Year:2009-10

Section 145ASection 43B

Section 145A of IT Act1961. 3. That the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bareilly is erroneous in law and on facts in deleting the addition rightly made by the Assessing Officer at Rs.83,00,475/- in closing stock of sugar. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer has observed that the assessee has suppressed