KISAN SAHKARI CHINI MILLS LIMITED ,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, LUCKNOW
In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 758/LKW/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Aug 2024AY 2009-10
Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguriaassessment Year:2009-10
Section 145ASection 43B
Section 145A of IT Act1961. 3. That the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals), Bareilly is erroneous in law and on facts in deleting the addition rightly made by the Assessing
Officer at Rs.83,00,475/- in closing stock of sugar.
During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer has observed that the assessee has suppressed