Search: disallowance | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

308 results for “disallowance”+ Deductionclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai12,293 Delhi10,090 Bangalore4,526 Chennai4,355 Kolkata3,344 Pune1,876 Ahmedabad1,747 Hyderabad1,251 Jaipur968 Cochin733 Chandigarh620 Indore506 Surat388 Raipur348 Visakhapatnam337 Rajkot314 Nagpur311 Lucknow308 Karnataka189 Panaji187 Amritsar175 Cuttack152 Jodhpur135 SC123 Ranchi120 Agra103 Patna103 Guwahati101 Dehradun89 Kerala68 Jabalpur63 Calcutta58 Allahabad50 Punjab & Haryana30 Varanasi23 Telangana23 Orissa11 Rajasthan7 Himachal Pradesh7 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN5 H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1 ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1 RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1 A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1 J&K1 MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1 Tripura1 Uttarakhand1 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1 Gauhati1

Key Topics

Addition to Income79 Section 15477 Section 1156 Disallowance51 Deduction44 Section 26338 Section 143(1)36 Section 36(1)(va)35 Section 12A33 Section 143(3)

VIDYUT TRANSMISSION KARMACHARI VETAN BHOGI CREDIT COOPERATIVE SOCIETY,LUCKNOW vs. CPC BANGALORE/ITO-2(1), LUCKNOW

Appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical

ITA 464/LKW/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow19 Dec 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

deduction under section 80P tax, CPC Assessing Officer disallowed deduction on grounds of return being filed belatedly only after intimation

SHIVA NEETI DEVELOPERS,KANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(4), KANPUR

Showing 1–20 of 308 · Page 1 of 16

...

32

Natural Justice32

Section 2(15)29

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 699/LKW/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow21 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri. Vijay Pal Raoassessment Year: 2014-15 Shiva Neeti Developers V. The Income Tax Officer 3A/185, Azad Nagar Ward 3(4) Kanpur Kanpur Tan/Pan:Abqfs8644D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Abhinav Mehrotra, Advocate Respondent By: Shri Amit Nigam, D.R. Date Of Hearing: 19 10 2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 21 10 2022 O R D E R This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 21.8.2017 Of The Ld. Cit(A)-I, Kanpur For The Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds:

For Appellant: Shri Abhinav Mehrotra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigam, D.R

Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 44ASection 801BSection 80ASection 80I

disallowance of deduction under section 80IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 made by the Assessing Officer for want of filing

SAHKARI GANNA VIKAS SAMITI LTD.,LAKHIMPUR KHERI vs. ACIT, SITAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 351/LKW/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow28 Nov 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshraassessment Year: 2019-20 Sahkari Ganna Vikas Samiti Acit Sitapur/Cpc, V. Limited Income Tax Deptt., C/O Ayyubi Chamber, Raniganj, Bengaluru-560500. Lakhimpur Kheri, U.P.-241001. Pan:Aawfs0887P (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Shubham Rastogi, C.A. Respondent By: Shri Sunil Kumar Rajwanshi, Addl. Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing: 26 11 2024

For Appellant: Shri Shubham Rastogi, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Rajwanshi, Addl

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 80ASection 80P

disallowance of deduction under Chapter VI-A. Section 80P of the Act falls under "C.-Deductions in respect of certain

M/S MODEL TANNERS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KANPUR

In the result, ITA No. 374/LKW/2017 is partly allowed while ITA No

ITA 374/LKW/2017[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow30 Jan 2026AY 2005-06

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Jaiswal, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Puneet Kumar, CIT DR

Section 153ASection 153CSection 153DSection 801BSection 80I

disallowance of deduction of Rs. 1,91,12,870/- claimed u/s 801B) which disallowance is arbitrary and be deleted. 06. Because

M/S MODEL TANNERS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KANPUR

In the result, ITA No. 374/LKW/2017 is partly allowed while ITA No

ITA 375/LKW/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow30 Jan 2026AY 2009-10

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Jaiswal, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Puneet Kumar, CIT DR

Section 153ASection 153CSection 153DSection 801BSection 80I

disallowance of deduction of Rs. 1,91,12,870/- claimed u/s 801B) which disallowance is arbitrary and be deleted. 06. Because

CO-OPERATIVE CANE DEVELOPMENT UNIAN, LTD. ,LAKHIPUR KHERI vs. ITO WARD-3(4), LAKHIPUR-1

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 348/LKW/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow02 Jan 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 253(3)Section 80ASection 80P

disallowance of deduction as incorrect claim by way of adjustment u/s 143(1)(a)(ii) of I. T. Act. 4. That

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (E), LUCKNOW vs. M/S. MAHARSHI PATANJALI VIDYA MANDIR SAMITI, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 178/LKW/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow04 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoorassessment Year: 2013-14 The Asstt. Cit (Exemptions) V. M/S Maharshi Patanjali Lucknow Vidya Mandir Samiti Tellar Ganj, Allahabad Tan/Pan:Aaatm7017R (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Rakesh Garg, Advocate Respondent By: Smt. Sheela Chopra, Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing: 31 05 2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 04 07 2022 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Sheela Chopra, CIT (DR)

Section 10Section 11Section 139(1)Section 143Section 143(1)

disallowance of deduction without appreciating the facts that deduction has rightly been disallowed. 2. Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A) has erred

CO-OP-CANE DEVELOPMENT UNION GOLA,LAKHIMPUR KHERI vs. ITO RANGE-3(4), LAKHIMPUR KHERI-1

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 185/LKW/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow24 Oct 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguriaco-Op Cane Development The Income Tax Officer, V. Union Gola Range-3(4) C/O Ayyubi Chamber, Raniganj, Lakhimpur Kheri-262701. Lakhimpur Kheri-262701, Up. Pan:Aaaac1960A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Shubham Rastogi, C.A. Respondent By: Shri Manu Chaurasia, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing: 15 10 2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 24 10 2024 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Shubham Rastogi, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Manu Chaurasia, CIT(DR)

Section 119Section 119(2)(b)Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 80Section 80ASection 80P

deduction u/s 80P of Chapter VI-A of I. T. Act of Rs. 11,07,25,716/- by incorrectly stating that the Return was filed beyond the time limit specified u/s 139(1) of I. T. Act and thereby invoking the provisions of section 80AC of I. T. Act , upheld the disallowance

SHAILENDRA KUMAR SINGH ,HARDOI vs. ITO-3(2),HARDOI-1, HARDOI

In the result, these appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 795/LKW/2024[2021-2022]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow24 Feb 2025AY 2021-2022

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshrait(Ss) A. Nos. 795 To 798/Lkw/2024 Assessment Year: 2021-22 Shailendra Kumar Singh Ito-3(2) V. Subhan Khera Sandila, Hardoi- Hardoi-1 241305. Uttar Pradesh-241305. Pan:Cvqps4275L (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellants By: Shri Naeem Khan, Ca Respondent By: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl. Cit(Dr) O R D E R

For Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl

disallowance of deduction under chapter VI-A Actual Facts: The claim referenced above is valid, and supporting documentation has been

M/S SATISH COLD STORAGE,KANPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE1(1)(1), KANPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 77/LKW/2021[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow25 May 2022AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 143(1)Section 154Section 50ISection 80I

disallowance of deduction u/s 80IB is involved and therefore, these appeals were heard together and for the sake of completeness

M/S SATISH COLD STORAGE,KANPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE1(1)(1), KANPUR, KANPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 76/LKW/2021[F.Y.2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow25 May 2022

Bench: Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 143(1)Section 154Section 50ISection 80I

disallowance of deduction u/s 80IB is involved and therefore, these appeals were heard together and for the sake of completeness

ASTT. COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW vs. M/S APCO INFRATECH PVT. LTD., LUCKNOW

In the result, appeal of the Revenue and Cross Objection of the assessee are dismissed, as indicated above

ITA 66/LKW/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow05 Sept 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri G. D. Padamahshali & Shri Subhash Malguriaassessment Year: 2014-15 The Asstt. Commissioner V. M/S Apco Infratech Pvt. Ltd Of Income Tax B-9, Vibhuti Khand Central Circle Ii Gomti Nagar Lucnow Lucknow Pan:Aadca5639H (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No.19/Lkw/2017 [In Ita No.66/Lkw/2017] Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S Apco Infratech Pvt. Ltd V. The Asstt. Commissioner Of B-9, Vibhuti Khand Income Tax Gomti Nagar Central Circle Ii Lucknow Lucnow Pan:Aadca5639H (Cross Objector) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra Kumar Yadav, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Neil Jain, CIT (DR)

Section 143(3)Section 194Section 80Section 80I

disallowance of claim of deduction of Rs.4,68,60,927/- under section 80IA of the Act. 6. The facts relating

ACIT, RANGE-I, LUCKNOW vs. M/S APCO INFRATECH PVT. LTD., LUCKNOW

ITA 454/LKW/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow02 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 80I

disallowance of interest income claimed as deduction under Section 80IA, the applicability of Section 14A for disallowance of expenses related

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

ITA 349/LKW/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 132Section 253(3)

Disallowances of deduction claimed u/s 80C of Rs. 1,50,000/- on repayment of housing loan That in the relevant

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW vs. RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY, GONDA U.P.

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

ITA 460/LKW/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 132Section 253(3)

Disallowances of deduction claimed u/s 80C of Rs. 1,50,000/- on repayment of housing loan That in the relevant

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

ITA 351/LKW/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Dec 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 132Section 253(3)

Disallowances of deduction claimed u/s 80C of Rs. 1,50,000/- on repayment of housing loan That in the relevant

A P S ACADEMY,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-IV(1), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 308/LKW/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow04 Jul 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri A.D Jain & Shri T.S. Kapoorassessment Year 2008-09 M/S A.P.S. Academy, The Income Tax Officer, 239, Leela Building, Vs. Ward –Iv(I), Senani Vihar, Lucknow Raibareilly Road, Lucknow Pan – Aaata 7665H (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 154Section 40

disallowed an expenditure of Rs.16,52,800/- for violation of provisions regarding tax deduction at source and the disallowance was made

M/S SARASWATI SHEET GRAH,KANPUR vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 17/LKW/2022[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow23 May 2022AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri T.S. Kapoor

Section 143Section 143(1)Section 154Section 50ISection 80I

disallowance of any loss carried forward, deduction, allowance or relief claimed which, on the basis of information available in the return

M/S SARASWATI SHEET GRAH,KANPUR vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGALORE, CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 16/LKW/2022[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow23 May 2022AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri T.S. Kapoor

Section 143Section 143(1)Section 154Section 50ISection 80I

disallowance of any loss carried forward, deduction, allowance or relief claimed which, on the basis of information available in the return

MR.BHUPENDRA KUMAR TIWARI,GONDA vs. ITO-6(1), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 79/LKW/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow29 Apr 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavaa.Ys. 2021-22 Mr. Bhupendra Kumar Tiwari, Vs. Ito, P.S. Bhitaree-1, Wazirganj, Ward 6(1) Distt. Gonda Lucknow Pan Agmpt 0366J (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Rakesh Garg, Advocate Respondent By Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl. Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 10/04/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 29/04/2024 O R D E R

Section 115BSection 144Section 234ASection 270ASection 271ASection 274Section 69A

disallowed deduction under Chapter VI-A Rs.1,50,000/- and also addition of cash deposited at bank Rs.21,00,000/- which