Search: condonation of delay

1 result for “condonation of delay”+ Section 69Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai28 Surat21 Jaipur21 Chandigarh17 Chennai17 Delhi16 Ahmedabad16 Kolkata14 Cochin14 Rajkot12 Bangalore11 Hyderabad11 Pune8 Dehradun6 Visakhapatnam4 Guwahati3 Indore2 SC2 Amritsar2 Lucknow1 Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 69A2 Section 132A2 Section 143(2)2

DIVESH KUMAR,BAREILLY vs. ACIT CENTRAL, BAREILLY

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 389/LKW/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow28 Nov 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshraassessment Year: 2019-20 Divesh Kumar Shri Kharak Singh V. Rawat, 19, Shishgarh, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh-243105. Dc/Acit-Cent, Bareilly Office Of The Acit, Central Circle Dc/Acit Cent Bareilly-1-243001 Pan:Cfdpk1712F (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: None (Adj Application Filed) Respondent By: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl. Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing: 19 11 2024

For Appellant: None (Adj application filed)For Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl

Section 127Section 132ASection 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 143Section 143(2)Section 69A

69B, 89C & 69D then taxes has to be charged in this section. Since in this case addition of Rs. 2,66,000/- has been-made u/s 69A of the Act, therefore, no interference is required. Thus, this ground of appeal is dismissed.” 4. The present appeal has been filed by the assessee in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) against