Search: condonation of delay

33 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 67clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Addition to Income21 Condonation of Delay18 Section 12A15 Section 143(1)15 Limitation/Time-bar13 Section 2(15)12 Section 80I12 Natural Justice11 Section 143(3)

ARPIT KUMAR TOMAR,UTTAR PRADESH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 250/LKW/2023[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow24 Feb 2025AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshraassessment Year: 2019-20 Arpit Kumar Tomar Income Tax Officer V. Flat No.B3, B21, Krishna 6(1), Lucknow, Uttar Garden, Sadarpur, Ghaziabad, Pradesh. Uttar Pradesh-201021. Pan:Ajbpt8004B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri V. Balaji, Fca Respondent By: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl. Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing: 13 02 2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 24 02 2025 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri V. Balaji, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 90

condone delay in filing of Form 67 does not vest with the AO or CPC or any other subordinate authority except to the extent as provided for by the CBDT in exercise of its powers conferred under the Act. Clearly the case of the appellant does not fall within such relaxation provided for by CEDT. For the detailed reasons

Showing 1–20 of 33 · Page 1 of 2

ARPIT KUMAR TOMAR,UTTAR PRADESH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, LUCKNOW

ARPIT KUMAR TOMAR,UTTAR PRADESH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, LUCKNOW

RAJNESH KUMAR,SITAPUR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, SITAPUR

RAJNESH KUMAR,SITAPUR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, SITAPUR

RAJNESH KUMAR,SITAPUR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, SITAPUR

RAJNESH KUMAR,SITAPUR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, SITAPUR

KASHYAP DIVYA JYOTI SEWA SOCIETY,SONEBHADRA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

KASHYAP DIVYA JYOTI SEWA SOCIETY,SONEBHADRA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION(, LUCKNOW

KASHYAP DIVYA JYOTI SEWA SOCIETY,SONEBHADRA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

BABIAN INN,LUCKNOW vs. ACIT, RANGE-I, LUCKNOW

MOQEETUR RAHMAN KHAN,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-4(1), LUCKNOW

RAJIV KUMAR,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. ITO-1(5) SHAHJAHANPUR-2, SHAHJAHANPUR

M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD,LUCKNOW vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD,LUCKNOW vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD,LUCKNOW vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

SMT.SATYAWATI MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,FAIZABAD vs. CIT EXEMPTION, LUCKNOW

M/S APCO INFRATECH PVT. LTD.,LUCKNOW vs. D/ACIT-1,CENTRAL-1, LUCKNOW

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-1, LUCKNOW, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, ASHOK MARG, LUCKNOW vs. APCO INFRATECH PVT. LTD., VIBHUTI KHAND GOMTI NAGAR LKO

M/S. APCO INFRATECH PVT. LTD.,LUCKNOW vs. ACIT-1, LUCKNOW

RAM ADHAREY,SANT KABBER NAGAR vs. ITO, BASTI NEW, BASTI

TANVEER BANO,UNNAO vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2(4), UNNAO