Search: condonation of delay

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 481clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 683 Section 133(6)2 Section 142(1)2 Addition to Income2 Limitation/Time-bar2 Condonation of Delay2

ACIT, RANGE-I, LUCKNOW vs. SHRI YOGESH MULWANI, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 446/LKW/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow01 Jun 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoorassessment Year: 2016-17 The Asstt. Cit V. Shri Yogesh Mulwani Range 1 36, Cantonment Road Lucknow Lucknow Tan/Pan:Ahnpm4669B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Harish Gidwani, D.R. Respondent By: Shri K.R. Rastogi, C.A. Date Of Hearing: 19 05 2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 01 06 2022 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Harish Gidwani, D.RFor Respondent: Shri K.R. Rastogi, C.A

Section 133(6)

condone the delay and admit the appeal for hearing. 3. Apropos addition of Rs.1,61,64,481/- under the head ‘Sundry Creditors’, the ld. CIT(A) deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer, observing as under: “4.4 I have considered the submission of the appellant, facts mentioned in the assessment order and Remand Report and rejoinder submitted

ACIT, RANGE-I, LUCKNOW vs. SHRI YOGESH MULWANI, LUCKNOW

NARENDRA SINGH BISHT,GOMTINAGAR vs. ACIT- 1, LUCKNOW-NEW, LUCKNOW

ACIT, RANGE-I, LUCKNOW vs. SHRI YOGESH MULWANI, LUCKNOW

NARENDRA SINGH BISHT,GOMTINAGAR vs. ACIT- 1, LUCKNOW-NEW, LUCKNOW