Search: condonation of delay

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 275(1)(c)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 1489 Section 271(1)(c)6 Section 696 Section 253(3)4 Addition to Income4 Condonation of Delay4 Section 1443 Section 1323 Reopening of Assessment

KOBSAI HOSPITALLITIES PVT. LTD.,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(1), LUCKNOW

In the result, ITA No.290/LKW/2025 is allowed for statistical purposes while

ITA 291/LKW/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow29 Aug 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Neeraj Kumar, CIT DR

Section 144Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 275(1)(a)Section 69

condoning the delay, the order passed by the CIT(A), NFAC, be set aside. 03. Because the entire proceedings-initiated u/s.148 are devoid of material or reasons, there being no reason to believe, the ground on which the reopening has been initiated is contrary to the facts, all being without jurisdiction, the entire proceedings are void-ab-initio be quashed

KOBSAI HOSPITALLITIES PVT. LTD.,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(1), LUCKNOW

KOBSAI HOSPITALLITIES PVT. LTD.,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(1), LUCKNOW

KOBSAI HOSPITALITIES PVT. LTD.,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(1), LUCKNOW

SHASHI INFRA CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.,LUCKNOW vs. ITO, LUCKNOW

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW vs. RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY, GONDA U.P.

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-V, LUCKNOW vs. PATEL PAN PRODUCTS LTD., LUCKNOW