VENUS NIRMAN PRIVATE LIMITED,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(4), LUCKNOW

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

condonation of delay being a discretionary power available to courts, exercise of discretion must necessarily depend upon the sufficiency of the cause shown and the degree of acceptability of the explanation, the length of delay being immaterial. In the present case, the service of the assessment order dated 07.12.2022 passed for AY 2021-22 on the appellant was not complete

VENUS NIRMAN PRIVATE LIMITED,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(4), LUCKNOW

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

condonation of delay being a discretionary power available to courts, exercise of discretion must necessarily depend upon the sufficiency of the cause shown and the degree of acceptability of the explanation, the length of delay being immaterial. In the present case, the service of the assessment order dated 07.12.2022 passed for AY 2021-22 on the appellant was not complete

M/S CO-OPERATIVE CANE DEVELOPMENT UNION GOLA,LAKHIMPUR KHERI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER RANGE-3(4), LAKHIMPUR KHERI-1

Bench: Sh. Kul Bharat & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

269/- from Zila Sahkari Bank, Gola and accordingly Interest accruing on the investments of the society to the extent of Loan from Zila Sahkari Bank cannot be said to be made out of Surplus Funds of the Society.” 2. At the very outset, it is observed that the appeals in these cases are delayed by 80 days (in 394/Lkw/2019

M/S CO-OPERATIVE CANE DEVELOPMENT UNION LTD,LAKHIMPUR KHERI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER -1, RANGE-3(4), LAKHIMPUR KHERI

Bench: Sh. Kul Bharat & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

269/- from Zila Sahkari Bank, Gola and accordingly Interest accruing on the investments of the society to the extent of Loan from Zila Sahkari Bank cannot be said to be made out of Surplus Funds of the Society.” 2. At the very outset, it is observed that the appeals in these cases are delayed by 80 days (in 394/Lkw/2019

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW vs. RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY, GONDA U.P.

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

condoned; and the Cross Objection is admitted for hearing, on merits. (B) In the course of appellate proceedings in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, (“ITAT” for short), following paper book were filed from the assessee’s side: 15 17 19 21 (B.1) Further, a consolidated synopsis, common for all the appeals and COs before us, was filed from assessee’s side

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

condoned; and the Cross Objection is admitted for hearing, on merits. (B) In the course of appellate proceedings in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, (“ITAT” for short), following paper book were filed from the assessee’s side: 15 17 19 21 (B.1) Further, a consolidated synopsis, common for all the appeals and COs before us, was filed from assessee’s side

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

condoned; and the Cross Objection is admitted for hearing, on merits. (B) In the course of appellate proceedings in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, (“ITAT” for short), following paper book were filed from the assessee’s side: 15 17 19 21 (B.1) Further, a consolidated synopsis, common for all the appeals and COs before us, was filed from assessee’s side

M/S CO-OPERATIVE CANE DEVELOPMENT UNION LTD.,LAKHIMPUR-KHERI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-I, LAKHIMPUR -KHERI

In the result, all three appeals are partly allowed

269/- from Zila Sahkari Bank, Gola and\naccordingly Interest accruing on the investments of the society to the extent of\nLoan from Zila Sahkari Bank cannot be said to be made out of Surplus Funds of\nthe Society.\nAt the very outset, it is observed that the appeals in these cases are delayed\nby 80 days (in 394/Lkw/2019), 65 days

DCIT, LUCKNOW vs. SAHARA INDIA MUTUAL BENIFIT CORP. LTD., LUCKNOW

In the result, both appeals of the Revenue and cross objections of the assessee/respondent are dismissed

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri S Rifaur Rahmanआअसं.683/लखनऊ /2000 (िन.व. 1996-97) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant Central Circle-I, Lucknow बनाम Vs. Sahara India Mutual Benefit Co. Ltd., 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow, Up ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Pan/Gir No. 111-S/Cc-I/Lko Co No. 10/Lkw/2004 (A.Y. 1996-97) In Ita No. 683/Lkw/2000 Sahara India Mutual Benefit Co. Ltd., (Since Amalgamated With Sahara India Commercial Corpn. Ltd.) 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow, Up ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant Pan/Gir No. 111-S/Cc-I/Lko बनाम Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Central Circle-I, Lucknow आअसं.684/ लखनऊ/2000 (िन.व. 1996-97) Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant Central Circle-1, New Delhi बनाम Vs. Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd. (Earlier Sahara India Mutal Benefit Ltd.) 2A Sahara India Sadan, Sakespeare Sarani, Kolkata 700071 ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Pan: Aadcs-6118-F

269 of the Act. While interpreting a judicial remedy, a Constitutional Court should not adopt an approach where the identity of the appellate forum would be contingent upon or vacillates subject to the exercise of some other power. Such an interpretation will clearly be against the interest of justice. Under Section 127, the authorities have the power to transfer

DCIT, LUCKNOW vs. SAHARA INDIA MUTUAL BENIFIT CORP. LTD., LUCKNOW

In the result, both appeals of the Revenue and cross objections of the assessee/respondent are dismissed

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri S Rifaur Rahmanआअसं.683/लखनऊ /2000 (िन.व. 1996-97) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant Central Circle-I, Lucknow बनाम Vs. Sahara India Mutual Benefit Co. Ltd., 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow, Up ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Pan/Gir No. 111-S/Cc-I/Lko Co No. 10/Lkw/2004 (A.Y. 1996-97) In Ita No. 683/Lkw/2000 Sahara India Mutual Benefit Co. Ltd., (Since Amalgamated With Sahara India Commercial Corpn. Ltd.) 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow, Up ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant Pan/Gir No. 111-S/Cc-I/Lko बनाम Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Central Circle-I, Lucknow आअसं.684/ लखनऊ/2000 (िन.व. 1996-97) Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant Central Circle-1, New Delhi बनाम Vs. Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd. (Earlier Sahara India Mutal Benefit Ltd.) 2A Sahara India Sadan, Sakespeare Sarani, Kolkata 700071 ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Pan: Aadcs-6118-F

269 of the Act. While interpreting a judicial remedy, a Constitutional Court should not adopt an approach where the identity of the appellate forum would be contingent upon or vacillates subject to the exercise of some other power. Such an interpretation will clearly be against the interest of justice. Under Section 127, the authorities have the power to transfer

DCIT, CC-1, LUCKNOW vs. SAHARA INDIA , LUCKNOW

In the result, all 11 appeals of the Revenue and 9 cross objections of the respondent/assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआअसं.3246/ िद"ी /2008(िन.व. 1995-96) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-6, R. No. 334, Ara Centre, ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant Jhandewalan Extn. New Delhi बनाम Vs. Sahara India 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Pan/Gir No. 19-219-Ft-3005-Cc-I, Lko & 303-S/C-I/Lko Co No. 249/Del/2009 (A.Y.1995-96) In Ita No.3246/Del/2008 Sahara India 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant Pan/Gir No. 19-219-Ft-3005-Cc-I, Lko & 303-S/C-I/Lko बनाम Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-6, R.No. 334, Ara Centre, ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Jhandewalan Extn. New Delhi आअसं.683/ लखनऊ/1999 (िन.व. 1995-96) Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant Central Circle-1, Lucknow बनाम Vs. Sahara India 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Pan/Gir No. 303-S/Cc-I/Lko

269 of the Act. While interpreting a judicial remedy, a Constitutional Court should not adopt an approach where the identity of the appellate forum would be contingent upon or vacillates subject to the exercise of some other power. Such an interpretation will clearly be against the interest of justice. Under Section 127, the authorities have the power to transfer

ACIT, LUCKNOW vs. SAHARA INDIA, LUCKNOW

In the result, all 11 appeals of the Revenue and 9 cross objections of the respondent/assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआअसं.3246/ िद"ी /2008(िन.व. 1995-96) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-6, R. No. 334, Ara Centre, ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant Jhandewalan Extn. New Delhi बनाम Vs. Sahara India 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Pan/Gir No. 19-219-Ft-3005-Cc-I, Lko & 303-S/C-I/Lko Co No. 249/Del/2009 (A.Y.1995-96) In Ita No.3246/Del/2008 Sahara India 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant Pan/Gir No. 19-219-Ft-3005-Cc-I, Lko & 303-S/C-I/Lko बनाम Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-6, R.No. 334, Ara Centre, ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Jhandewalan Extn. New Delhi आअसं.683/ लखनऊ/1999 (िन.व. 1995-96) Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant Central Circle-1, Lucknow बनाम Vs. Sahara India 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Pan/Gir No. 303-S/Cc-I/Lko

269 of the Act. While interpreting a judicial remedy, a Constitutional Court should not adopt an approach where the identity of the appellate forum would be contingent upon or vacillates subject to the exercise of some other power. Such an interpretation will clearly be against the interest of justice. Under Section 127, the authorities have the power to transfer

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, LUCKNOW vs. SAHARA INDIA, LUCKNOW

In the result, all 11 appeals of the Revenue and 9 cross objections of the respondent/assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआअसं.3246/ िद"ी /2008(िन.व. 1995-96) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-6, R. No. 334, Ara Centre, ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant Jhandewalan Extn. New Delhi बनाम Vs. Sahara India 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Pan/Gir No. 19-219-Ft-3005-Cc-I, Lko & 303-S/C-I/Lko Co No. 249/Del/2009 (A.Y.1995-96) In Ita No.3246/Del/2008 Sahara India 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant Pan/Gir No. 19-219-Ft-3005-Cc-I, Lko & 303-S/C-I/Lko बनाम Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-6, R.No. 334, Ara Centre, ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Jhandewalan Extn. New Delhi आअसं.683/ लखनऊ/1999 (िन.व. 1995-96) Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant Central Circle-1, Lucknow बनाम Vs. Sahara India 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Pan/Gir No. 303-S/Cc-I/Lko

269 of the Act. While interpreting a judicial remedy, a Constitutional Court should not adopt an approach where the identity of the appellate forum would be contingent upon or vacillates subject to the exercise of some other power. Such an interpretation will clearly be against the interest of justice. Under Section 127, the authorities have the power to transfer

DCIT, CC-1, LUCKNOW vs. SAHARA INDIA, LUCKNOW

In the result, all 11 appeals of the Revenue and 9 cross objections of the respondent/assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआअसं.3246/ िद"ी /2008(िन.व. 1995-96) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-6, R. No. 334, Ara Centre, ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant Jhandewalan Extn. New Delhi बनाम Vs. Sahara India 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Pan/Gir No. 19-219-Ft-3005-Cc-I, Lko & 303-S/C-I/Lko Co No. 249/Del/2009 (A.Y.1995-96) In Ita No.3246/Del/2008 Sahara India 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant Pan/Gir No. 19-219-Ft-3005-Cc-I, Lko & 303-S/C-I/Lko बनाम Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-6, R.No. 334, Ara Centre, ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Jhandewalan Extn. New Delhi आअसं.683/ लखनऊ/1999 (िन.व. 1995-96) Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant Central Circle-1, Lucknow बनाम Vs. Sahara India 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Pan/Gir No. 303-S/Cc-I/Lko

269 of the Act. While interpreting a judicial remedy, a Constitutional Court should not adopt an approach where the identity of the appellate forum would be contingent upon or vacillates subject to the exercise of some other power. Such an interpretation will clearly be against the interest of justice. Under Section 127, the authorities have the power to transfer

SAHARA INDIA, ,LUCKNOW vs. ACIT, CC-1, LUCKNOW

In the result, all 11 appeals of the Revenue and 9 cross objections of the respondent/assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआअसं.3246/ िद"ी /2008(िन.व. 1995-96) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-6, R. No. 334, Ara Centre, ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant Jhandewalan Extn. New Delhi बनाम Vs. Sahara India 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Pan/Gir No. 19-219-Ft-3005-Cc-I, Lko & 303-S/C-I/Lko Co No. 249/Del/2009 (A.Y.1995-96) In Ita No.3246/Del/2008 Sahara India 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant Pan/Gir No. 19-219-Ft-3005-Cc-I, Lko & 303-S/C-I/Lko बनाम Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-6, R.No. 334, Ara Centre, ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Jhandewalan Extn. New Delhi आअसं.683/ लखनऊ/1999 (िन.व. 1995-96) Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant Central Circle-1, Lucknow बनाम Vs. Sahara India 1, Kapoorthala Complex, Aliganj, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh ..... "ितवादी/Respondent Pan/Gir No. 303-S/Cc-I/Lko

269 of the Act. While interpreting a judicial remedy, a Constitutional Court should not adopt an approach where the identity of the appellate forum would be contingent upon or vacillates subject to the exercise of some other power. Such an interpretation will clearly be against the interest of justice. Under Section 127, the authorities have the power to transfer