BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 246A(1)(q)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi93Chennai27Mumbai5Lucknow4Visakhapatnam3Bangalore2Indore2Jodhpur1Varanasi1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 271F20Section 285B6Section 2715Section 246A5Section 246A(1)(q)4Penalty4Section 2742

THE SUB- REGISTRAR,HAMIRPUR vs. DI (INTELLIGENCE & CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION, KANPUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the aforesaid two different assessee's in ITA No

ITA 250/LKW/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow18 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar**

Section 246A(1)(q)Section 271Section 271FSection 274Section 285B

246A(1)(q) of the 1961 Act.* *Thus, under these circumstances as narrated above, we are setting aside appellate order passed by ld. CIT(A) as not sustainable in the eyes of the law and restore the matter back to the file of ld. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication of all the grievances/grounds of appeal raised by the assessee

THE SUB-REGISTRAR,HAMIRPUR vs. DI (INTELLIGENCE & CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION, KANPUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the aforesaid two different assessee's in ITA No

ITA 251/LKW/2018[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow18 Oct 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar**

Section 246A(1)(q)Section 271Section 271FSection 274Section 285B

246A(1)(q) of the 1961 Act.* *Thus, under these circumstances as narrated above, we are setting aside appellate order passed by ld. CIT(A) as not sustainable in the eyes of the law and restore the matter back to the file of ld. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication of all the grievances/grounds of appeal raised by the assessee

THE SUB-REGISTRAR,KUSHINAGAR vs. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (I & CI), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 241/LKW/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow05 Apr 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri A. P. Sinha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Harish Gidwani, D.R
Section 246Section 246ASection 246A(1)(q)Section 271FSection 271f

condone the delay and admit this appeal for hearing. - 3. As per the ld. Counsel for the assessee, the issue is as to whether appeal before the ld. CIT(A) is maintainable against the penalty levied under section 271FA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for failure to furnish annual information return. The ld. CIT(A) says that the subject

M/S DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,BARABANKI vs. JOINT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (I& CI ), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn

ITA 682/LKW/2018[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 246ASection 271Section 271F

q) to sub-section (1) of Section 246A of the I. T. Act, which provides that an appeal against order imposing penalty under Chapter-XXI would lie with CIT(A). It has also been noticed that the assessee has submitted an application, received by the Registry of this office on 16/12/2024, in which request has been made by the assessee