DHARAMVEER,PILIBHIT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, PILIBHIT
In the result, the appeal of the Assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 57/LKW/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Mar 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastavaassessment Year: 2017-18 Dharamveer V. Income Tax Officer R/O Mohalla Bakhtawar Lal Ward 2(4) Barah Patthar Chauraha Pilibhit-1 Tehsil Bisalpur Pilibhit Tan/Pan:Amvpd5162F (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Veerender Kumar, Advocate Respondent By: Shri Sunil Kumar Rajwanshi, D.R. Date Of Hearing: 04 03 2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 11 03 2025 O R D E R
For Appellant: Shri Veerender Kumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Rajwanshi, D.R
Section 115BSection 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 271ASection 272A(1)(d)Section 69A
234A and 234B of the I.T. Act, 1961. 6. That on the facts and in the circumstances Assessing
Officer has erred in law as well as in facts both by imposing the penalty under section 271AAC(1) and u/s 272A(1)(d) of the I.T. Act, 1961. 5. The Ld. Authorized Representative for the assessee submitted that there
