Search: condonation of delay

8 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 230clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 119(2)(b)12 Condonation of Delay8 Section 12A6 Section 11(2)6 Section 139(1)6 Addition to Income4 Section 253(3)3 Section 1323 Section 11

BHALCHANDRA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal in I

ITA 197/LKW/2018[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow19 May 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 11Section 11(2)Section 119(2)(b)Section 12ASection 139Section 139(1)Section 154

230 will become infructuous and can be dismissed as such. 3. Learned D. R., on the other hand, submitted that the Circular No.7/2018 has been considered by learned CIT (Exemptions) and he has held that the delay in filing the return of income was not due to genuine I.T.A. No.191/Lkw/2019, 197/Lkw/2018 3 I.T.A. No.230/Lkw/2019 Assessment Year:2016-17 reason

BHALCHANDRA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), LUCKNOW

BHALCHANDRA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), LUCKNOW

BHALCHANDRA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), LUCKNOW

BHALCHANDRA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,LUCKNOW vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

SANJAY KUMAR,NIGHASAN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (NFAC), AO ASSESSMENT UNIT(NFAC), NEW DELHI

RAKESH KUMAR JAISWAL,BARABANKI vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE -5, LUCKNOW

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW vs. RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY, GONDA U.P.