Search: condonation of delay

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 202clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 56(2)(x)5 Section 40A(3)3 Section 143(3)3 Section 119(2)(b)3 Section 1543 Addition to Income3 Condonation of Delay3 Section 133(6)2 Section 244

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, FAIZABAD vs. SMT. SARITA NAINWANI, PROP. M/S. BHOLA PHARMA, FAIZABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed whereas the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 36/LKW/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow17 Aug 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoorassessment Year: 2011-12 The Dy. Cit V. Smt. Sarita Nainwani Circle, Faizabad Prop. M/S Bhola Pharma 3/2/18, Mukeri Tola Faizabad Tan/Pan:Ahtpn1830B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2011-12 Smt. Sarita Nainwani V. The Income Tax Officer-Ii Prop. M/S Bhola Pharma Faizabad 3/2/18, Mukeri Tola Faizabad Tan/Pan:Ahtpn1830B (Appellant) (Respondent) Department By: Shri Harish Gidwani, D.R. Assessee By : Shri P. K. Kapoor, C.A. Date Of Hearing: 25 07 2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 17 08 2022 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri P. K. Kapoor, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Harish Gidwani, D.R

Section 143(3)Section 40A(3)

condone the delay. 4. The Revenue has raised the following Grounds of Appeal: 1. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the addition of Rs.1,76,12,585/- ignoring the facts brought out by the Assessing Officer that the assessee has made cash payments to parties on a regular basis, thus violating the provisions

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, FAIZABAD vs. SMT. SARITA NAINWANI, PROP. M/S. BHOLA PHARMA, FAIZABAD

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, FAIZABAD vs. SMT. SARITA NAINWANI, PROP. M/S. BHOLA PHARMA, FAIZABAD

ACIT, RANGE-I, LUCKNOW vs. SHRI YOGESH MULWANI, LUCKNOW

EXCLUSIVE SELECTION CHIKAN (P), LTD,LUCKNOW vs. NFAC, DELHI

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, BAREILLY vs. MS VARUNA WAREHOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED, BAREILLY