JAMUNA DEVI NARESH CHANDRA MAHAVIDYALAYA,JALAUN vs. ITO-TDS, KANPUR
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 464/LKW/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow21 May 2025AY 2013-14
Bench: SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, DR
Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E
section 200A and the date of filing the appeal. To our mind, without enquiring into, when or whether the assessee was actually served with the order, it was not proper to hold the period of delay as six years or to hold that there was inordinate delay. We notice, that in the case of Senior Bhonsle Estate (HUF) vs. ACIT
