BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 194Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Kolkata32Mumbai29Chennai24Delhi23Hyderabad5Bangalore4Patna4Lucknow3Visakhapatnam2Allahabad2Indore2Jaipur2Rajkot2Surat2Varanasi2Ahmedabad2Amritsar1Raipur1Karnataka1Jabalpur1Cochin1Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 1486Section 1473Cash Deposit3Addition to Income3Condonation of Delay3Section 270A2Section 194A2Section 142(1)2Section 144

NOMAN HUSAIN,LUCKNOW vs. ITO-3(2), HARDOI

In the result, both the appeals of the Assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 96/LKW/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow21 Nov 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

For Appellant: Shri Mustaq Ahmad Mir, CostFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Sr. D.R
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 194ASection 270ASection 270A(9)

194J of the Act. The assessee did not file the return of income in response to notice issued under section 148 of the Act also. Thereafter, notice under section 142(1) of the Act along with questionnaire was issued to the assessee, but again there was no compliance from the side of the assessee. Subsequently, five more notices were issued

2
Section 144B2
Section 270A(9)2
Penalty2

NOMAN HUSSAIN,LUCKNOW vs. ITO-3(2), HARDOI

In the result, both the appeals of the Assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 97/LKW/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow21 Nov 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

For Appellant: Shri Mustaq Ahmad Mir, CostFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Sr. D.R
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 194ASection 270ASection 270A(9)

194J of the Act. The assessee did not file the return of income in response to notice issued under section 148 of the Act also. Thereafter, notice under section 142(1) of the Act along with questionnaire was issued to the assessee, but again there was no compliance from the side of the assessee. Subsequently, five more notices were issued

DR. R.M. LOHIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES,LUCKNOW vs. NFAC, , DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 519/LKW/2025[201-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow13 Jan 2026

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. B.P. Yadav, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Neeraj Kumar, CIT DR
Section 10Section 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 194CSection 194J

194J Rs. 2,11,111/- On account of non-deduction of tax u/s 194C Rs. 20,23,872/- Rs. 22,41,06,732/- 6. That being aggrieved by the assessment order so passed, assessee filed appeal before the office of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC with a prayer for the condonation of delay of 20 days. 7. That