BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 194Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Nagpur100Chandigarh81Chennai32Mumbai25Bangalore22Pune22Jaipur17Delhi17Hyderabad16Kolkata13Ahmedabad8Cochin7Raipur7Surat6Rajkot5Visakhapatnam4Panaji3Lucknow3SC3Varanasi2Jodhpur2Karnataka1Cuttack1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 1486Section 1474Section 194A3Cash Deposit3Penalty3Addition to Income3Section 270A2Section 142(1)2Section 1442

NOMAN HUSAIN,LUCKNOW vs. ITO-3(2), HARDOI

In the result, both the appeals of the Assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 96/LKW/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow21 Nov 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

For Appellant: Shri Mustaq Ahmad Mir, CostFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Sr. D.R
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 194ASection 270ASection 270A(9)

194A and 194J of the Act. The assessee did not file the return of income in response to notice issued under section 148 of the Act also. Thereafter, notice under section 142(1) of the Act along with questionnaire was issued to the assessee, but again there was no compliance from the side of the assessee. Subsequently, five more notices

Section 144B2
Section 270A(9)2
Natural Justice2

NOMAN HUSSAIN,LUCKNOW vs. ITO-3(2), HARDOI

In the result, both the appeals of the Assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 97/LKW/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow21 Nov 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

For Appellant: Shri Mustaq Ahmad Mir, CostFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Sr. D.R
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 194ASection 270ASection 270A(9)

194A and 194J of the Act. The assessee did not file the return of income in response to notice issued under section 148 of the Act also. Thereafter, notice under section 142(1) of the Act along with questionnaire was issued to the assessee, but again there was no compliance from the side of the assessee. Subsequently, five more notices

WAQF DARGAH RAJJAB SALAR,BAHRAICH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1, BAHRAICH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 22/LKW/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow24 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Anadee Nath Misshraassessment Year: 2018-19 Waqf Dargah Rajjab Salar Vs. Ito-1 C/O Kazi Faizur Rehman Bahraich - New C-90, Sector M Aliganj, Lucknow Tan/Pan:Aaaaw7179H (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Saurabh Gupta, C.A. Respondent By: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, D.R. Date Of Hearing: 20 02 2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 24 02 2025 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Saurabh Gupta, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, D.R
Section 115BSection 147Section 148Section 194ASection 69A

194A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called “the Act’) during the year under consideration. The assessee had not filed return of ITA No.22/LKW/2025 Page 2 of 5 income for the year under consideration. The AO, therefore, reopened the case of the assessee under section 147 of the Act to ascertain the genuineness of the source of cash deposits