DIVESH KUMAR,BAREILLY vs. ACIT CENTRAL, BAREILLY
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed
ITA 389/LKW/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow28 Nov 2024AY 2019-20
Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshraassessment Year: 2019-20 Divesh Kumar Shri Kharak Singh V. Rawat, 19, Shishgarh, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh-243105. Dc/Acit-Cent, Bareilly Office Of The Acit, Central Circle Dc/Acit Cent Bareilly-1-243001 Pan:Cfdpk1712F (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: None (Adj Application Filed) Respondent By: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl. Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing: 19 11 2024
For Appellant: None (Adj application filed)For Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl
Section 127Section 132ASection 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 143Section 143(2)Section 69A
delay the tax proceedings. Despite being provided enough opportunity, the assessee chose to remain silent and decided not to bring any material on record.
Hence, the assessing officer has left with no other option but to complete the assessment proceedings in the case of assessee on the basis of factual material available on record.
5.1 Observation..
On examination
