ROHILKHAND EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE TRUST,BAREILLY vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BAREILLY

In the result, both appeals of the assessee in ITA No

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the A.Ys.2017-18 and 2018-19,\ndismissing the appeals of the assessee against orders passed by the Assessing\nOfficer under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The grounds of appeal\nare as under:-\n\nITA No.181/LKW/2024\n“(1).That the Ld. Authorities below have erred

MORADABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,MORADABAD vs. DCIT(EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result, ITA No. 1071/Del/2020, ITA No

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudharyita Nos.273,199/Lkw/2019 A.Ys. 2014-15 & 2015-16 Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. M/S Moradabad Development (Exemption), Lucknow Authority, Kanth Road, Moradabad Pan:Aajfm7731M (Appellant) (Respondent)

section 2(15) and the various case laws on the subject, which again were outside the purview of jurisdiction under section 154 and his own powers under section 250. 23. It may not be out of place to mention at this stage, that the Hon’ble Lucknow Bench of the ITAT has dealt with this issue (of violation of section

MORADABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,MORADABAD vs. DY. CIT(EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result, ITA No. 1071/Del/2020, ITA No

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudharyita Nos.273,199/Lkw/2019 A.Ys. 2014-15 & 2015-16 Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. M/S Moradabad Development (Exemption), Lucknow Authority, Kanth Road, Moradabad Pan:Aajfm7731M (Appellant) (Respondent)

section 2(15) and the various case laws on the subject, which again were outside the purview of jurisdiction under section 154 and his own powers under section 250. 23. It may not be out of place to mention at this stage, that the Hon’ble Lucknow Bench of the ITAT has dealt with this issue (of violation of section

MORADABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,MORADABAD vs. DCIT(EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result, ITA No. 1071/Del/2020, ITA No

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudharyita Nos.273,199/Lkw/2019 A.Ys. 2014-15 & 2015-16 Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. M/S Moradabad Development (Exemption), Lucknow Authority, Kanth Road, Moradabad Pan:Aajfm7731M (Appellant) (Respondent)

section 2(15) and the various case laws on the subject, which again were outside the purview of jurisdiction under section 154 and his own powers under section 250. 23. It may not be out of place to mention at this stage, that the Hon’ble Lucknow Bench of the ITAT has dealt with this issue (of violation of section

DY. CIT(EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW vs. MORADABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MORADABAD

In the result, ITA No. 1071/Del/2020, ITA No

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudharyita Nos.273,199/Lkw/2019 A.Ys. 2014-15 & 2015-16 Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. M/S Moradabad Development (Exemption), Lucknow Authority, Kanth Road, Moradabad Pan:Aajfm7731M (Appellant) (Respondent)

section 2(15) and the various case laws on the subject, which again were outside the purview of jurisdiction under section 154 and his own powers under section 250. 23. It may not be out of place to mention at this stage, that the Hon’ble Lucknow Bench of the ITAT has dealt with this issue (of violation of section

BRIGHT LAND COLLEGE,,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudharya.Y. 2013-14 Bright Land College, Vs. Income Tax Officer 538A / 543/5, Triveni Nagar (Exemption), Lucknow, The Sitapur Road, Lucknow Jurisdictional Assessing Officer Pan:Aaatb4391F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Ms. Shweta Mittal, C.A. Revenue By: Sh. Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl. Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing: 02.04.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 25.04.2025 O R D E R Per Nikhil Choudhary, A.M.: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A), Nfac Passed On 17.10.2022 Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. The Grounds Of Appeal Preferred By The Assessee Are As Under:- “1. The Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeal) Has Erred In Law & On Facts In Passing The Order, Which Is Unlawful, Unjustified & Against The Principles Of Natural Justice. 2. The Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeal) Has Erred In Law & On Facts In Passing The Order Without Giving Adequate Opportunity Of Being Heard. 3. The Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeal) Has Erred In Law & On Facts In Upholding Ad Hoc Disallowance Of Expense Of Rs. 1,54,57,795/- Against The Order Passed U/S 143(1) Of Income-Tax Act Without Following The Procedure Laid Down In Sub-Section (1) Of Section 143 Of Income-Tax Act, 1961. 4. The Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeal) Has Erred In Law & On Facts In Not Granting Exemption U/S 11 & 12 Of The I. T. Act, 1961. 1 Bright Land College A.Y. 2013-14

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The grounds of appeal preferred by the assessee are as under:- “1. The Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeal) has erred in law and on facts in passing the order, which is unlawful, unjustified and against the principles of natural justice. 2. The Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeal) has erred

CHARAK HELTH CARE & RURAL DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY,LUCKNOW vs. DCIT-CC-2, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 16.05.2024, wherein the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal assessee against the orders of the Assessing Officer under section 143(1) that passed for the A.Y. 2013-14 on 15.06.2020. The grounds of appeal are as under:- “1. 1 Because the order passed by Ld. CIT(A) is contrary to facts

ACIT(E), LUCKNOW vs. M/S. GANGOTRI HUMAN RESOURCES & DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY, ALLAHABAD

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri G. D. Padmahshali & Shri Subhash Malguriaआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.221/Lkw/2020 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2014-15 Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax Exemption, Lucknow . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant

250 of the Income Tax Act [‘the Act’ in short] by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals, Allahabad [‘CIT(A)’ in short] the Revenue filed this instant appeal u/s 253(2) of the Act. 2. The case was called twice, none appeared at the bequest of the assessee. Adverting to letter dt. 26/06/2024 the Ld. DR Smt. Pandey submitted

UP GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES WELFARE,LUCKNOW vs. ACIT-2, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

charitable purposes or religious purposes, or in part only for such purposes; or income by way of voluntary contribution on behalf of such trust or institution.\nc. As per section 139(5) clause (a) \"the annexure, statements and columns in the return of income relating to computation of income chargeable under each head of income, computation of gross total income

TULSI GRAMODYOG SEWA SAMITI,LUCKNOW vs. THE CIT (EXEMPTIONS), LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals of the assessee stands dismissed

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

section 12AA to the assessee society and as cancelled on a wrong premise, be withdrawn and the registration as granted earlier be restored. 08. Because without prejudice to the aforesaid grounds of appeal there is nothing on record, not even in the statement recorded at the time of survey; and also, not even the reports of the DCIT(Inv.), Kolkata

TULSI GRAMODYOG SEWA SAMITI,,LUCKNOW vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals of the assessee stands dismissed

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

section 12AA to the assessee society and as cancelled on a wrong premise, be withdrawn and the registration as granted earlier be restored. 08. Because without prejudice to the aforesaid grounds of appeal there is nothing on record, not even in the statement recorded at the time of survey; and also, not even the reports of the DCIT(Inv.), Kolkata

ACIT(E), LUCKNOW vs. M/S. BHAGWANT INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, BIJNOR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

6 to 14 years'\nHon'ble Apex Court while concluding the case of Unni Krishann J.P &\nOthers (Supra) held:\n“Regulatory measures must so ensure that private educational institutions\nmaintain minimum standards and facilities. Admission within. all groups\nand categories should be based only on merit. There may be reservation of\nseats in favour of the weaker sections

RAJDHANI NAGAR SAHKARI BANK LTD,LUCKNOW vs. DY.CIT RANGE-6, LUCKNOW

In the result, both the appeals in ITA Nos

charitable activities by the assessee trust, and there was no doubt about\nthe fact of embezzlement, the same was allowable as a revenue loss. We further\nobserve that the Hon'ble ITAT Bangalore 'A' Bench in the case of ACIT, Circle-1,\nDevangere vs. M/s. Davangere District Central Co-op Bank Limited in ITA No.\n1403/Bang/2019 has also studied

DISTRICT COOPERETIV BANK LTD,BARABANKI vs. DCIT/ACIT-3, LUCKNOW- NEW

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri. Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshraassessment Year: 2019-20 District Cooperative Bank V. Dcit/Acit-3 Barabanki Maka Satrikh Lucknow - New Faizabad-Lucknow Road Barabanki Tan/Pan:Aaaad2777N (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri B. P. Yadav, Cost Accountant Respondent By: Shri Sunil Kumar Rajwanshi, D.R. O R D E R

section 253(5) of the Act, that there was sufficient cause for delay in filing the appeal. ITA No.178/LKW/2022 Page 3 of 4 Accordingly, we condone the delay and the appeal is admitted for hearing on merits. (C) In the course of appellate proceedings in ITAT, a paper book containing the following particulars was filed from the assessee’s side