BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “capital gains”+ Section 482clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi222Mumbai154Bangalore98Chennai59Chandigarh49Jaipur32Ahmedabad30Kolkata26Indore20Lucknow12Hyderabad11Karnataka8Pune6SC6Telangana4Ranchi4Rajkot4Visakhapatnam1Andhra Pradesh1Dehradun1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Nagpur1Raipur1Rajasthan1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 1132Section 1516Section 2(15)16Exemption11Section 12A8Section 143(3)8Survey u/s 133A8Section 2503Section 80P3Section 14

SHYAM SUNDER GUPTA,KANPUR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KANPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 168/LKW/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow06 May 2025AY 2012-13
Section 150Section 150(1)Section 153(3)(ii)Section 2(22)(e)Section 251(2)Section 41(1)

capital gains arising before the 1st day of\nApril, 1946, or after the 32st day of March 1948, and before the 1st day of\nApril, 1956. Explanation 2, - The expression “accumulated profits" in sub-\nclause (a), (b), (d) and (e), shall include all profits of the company up to the\ndate of distribution or payment referred to in those

ASTT. COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW vs. M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD, LUCKNOW

3
Deduction3
Limitation/Time-bar3

In the result, all the grounds taken in the appeals and ground 1 of additional grounds of the Revenue stand dismissed and additional ground

ITA 165/LKW/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Jun 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 15Section 2(15)

482 (AP). In the instant case, the beneficiary is not covered by the list of persons mentioned in Section 13(3) of the Act. Page 26 of 242 (UP AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD) Hence, we set aside the impugned order passed by the Tribunal and restored the order passed by the A.O. The answer to the question is in negative

ASTT. COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW vs. M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the grounds taken in the appeals and ground 1 of additional grounds of the Revenue stand dismissed and additional ground

ITA 211/LKW/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 15Section 2(15)

482 (AP). In the instant case, the beneficiary is not covered by the list of persons mentioned in Section 13(3) of the Act. Page 26 of 242 (UP AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD) Hence, we set aside the impugned order passed by the Tribunal and restored the order passed by the A.O. The answer to the question is in negative

ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW vs. M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the grounds taken in the appeals and ground 1 of additional grounds of the Revenue stand dismissed and additional ground

ITA 23/LKW/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Jun 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 15Section 2(15)

482 (AP). In the instant case, the beneficiary is not covered by the list of persons mentioned in Section 13(3) of the Act. Page 26 of 242 (UP AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD) Hence, we set aside the impugned order passed by the Tribunal and restored the order passed by the A.O. The answer to the question is in negative

ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW vs. M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the grounds taken in the appeals and ground 1 of additional grounds of the Revenue stand dismissed and additional ground

ITA 24/LKW/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 15Section 2(15)

482 (AP). In the instant case, the beneficiary is not covered by the list of persons mentioned in Section 13(3) of the Act. Page 26 of 242 (UP AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD) Hence, we set aside the impugned order passed by the Tribunal and restored the order passed by the A.O. The answer to the question is in negative

ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW vs. M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the grounds taken in the appeals and ground 1 of additional grounds of the Revenue stand dismissed and additional ground

ITA 630/LKW/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Jun 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 15Section 2(15)

482 (AP). In the instant case, the beneficiary is not covered by the list of persons mentioned in Section 13(3) of the Act. Page 26 of 242 (UP AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD) Hence, we set aside the impugned order passed by the Tribunal and restored the order passed by the A.O. The answer to the question is in negative

ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW vs. M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the grounds taken in the appeals and ground 1 of additional grounds of the Revenue stand dismissed and additional ground

ITA 631/LKW/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 15Section 2(15)

482 (AP). In the instant case, the beneficiary is not covered by the list of persons mentioned in Section 13(3) of the Act. Page 26 of 242 (UP AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD) Hence, we set aside the impugned order passed by the Tribunal and restored the order passed by the A.O. The answer to the question is in negative

ASTT. COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW vs. M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the grounds taken in the appeals and ground 1 of additional grounds of the Revenue stand dismissed and additional ground

ITA 164/LKW/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Jun 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 15Section 2(15)

482 (AP). In the instant case, the beneficiary is not covered by the list of persons mentioned in Section 13(3) of the Act. Page 26 of 242 (UP AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD) Hence, we set aside the impugned order passed by the Tribunal and restored the order passed by the A.O. The answer to the question is in negative

ASTT. COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW vs. M/S U.P AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD, LUCKNOW

In the result, all the grounds taken in the appeals and ground 1 of additional grounds of the Revenue stand dismissed and additional ground

ITA 210/LKW/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow08 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 15Section 2(15)

482 (AP). In the instant case, the beneficiary is not covered by the list of persons mentioned in Section 13(3) of the Act. Page 26 of 242 (UP AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD) Hence, we set aside the impugned order passed by the Tribunal and restored the order passed by the A.O. The answer to the question is in negative

INCOME TAX OFFICER, GONDA vs. M/S. CANE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL, BALRAMPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 34/LKW/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow28 Apr 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SH.SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Jagat Narayan Shukla, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Sunil Kumar Rajwanshi, Addl CIT (DR)
Section 14Section 250Section 80P

482/- and commission receipt from Chini Mills on supply of Cane by its members was seen to be Rs.4,06,81,322/- in the accounts of the assessee, but in the data base of the Income Tax Department and the ITR filed by the assessee, the amounts were seen to be Rs.4,27,820/- on account of interest and Rs.7

INCOME TAX OFFICER, GONDA vs. M/S. CANE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL, BALRAMPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 247/LKW/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow28 Apr 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SH.SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Jagat Narayan Shukla, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Sunil Kumar Rajwanshi, Addl CIT (DR)
Section 14Section 250Section 80P

482/- and commission receipt from Chini Mills on supply of Cane by its members was seen to be Rs.4,06,81,322/- in the accounts of the assessee, but in the data base of the Income Tax Department and the ITR filed by the assessee, the amounts were seen to be Rs.4,27,820/- on account of interest and Rs.7

INCOME TAX OFFICER, GONDA vs. M/S COOPERATIVE CANE DEVELOPMENT UNION LTD, BALRAMPUR, BALRAMPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 243/LKW/2020[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow28 Apr 2025AY 2014-2015

Bench: SH.SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Jagat Narayan Shukla, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Sunil Kumar Rajwanshi, Addl CIT (DR)
Section 14Section 250Section 80P

482/- and commission receipt from Chini Mills on supply of Cane by its members was seen to be Rs.4,06,81,322/- in the accounts of the assessee, but in the data base of the Income Tax Department and the ITR filed by the assessee, the amounts were seen to be Rs.4,27,820/- on account of interest and Rs.7