Search: capital gains

5 results for “capital gains”+ Section 10(2)(xv)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai125 Delhi110 Chandigarh83 Jaipur37 Hyderabad29 SC28 Guwahati21 Amritsar11 Nagpur11 Bangalore10 Ahmedabad7 Raipur7 Surat5 Chennai5 Lucknow5 Jodhpur4 Pune4 Kolkata3 Cochin3 Visakhapatnam2 Ranchi1 Dehradun1 Patna1

Key Topics

Section 153A12 Section 56(2)(vii)8 Section 153D6 Section 685 Addition to Income5 Section 1323 Section 1483 Section 2502

NIRMAL SINGH,AYODHYA vs. ITO WARD-1,, FAIZABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 83/LKW/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow10 Oct 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria & Sa. No. 07/Lkw/2024 (Arising Out Of Ita. No.83/Lkw/2024 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) Nirmal Singh The Income Tax Officer, V. 15/2/16, Janki Ghat, Ayodhya- Ward-1, 224123, Faizabad (Up). Cinema Road, Faizabad- New-224001. Pan:Bdsps4165C (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri. Rakesh Garg, Adv Respondent By: Shri. Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl. Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing: 24 09 2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 10 10 2024 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri. Rakesh Garg, AdvFor Respondent: Shri. Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl

Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 151Section 250Section 56(2)(vii)

xv) The manner in which the things are to be done is to be strictly followed. Any deviation would make the proceedings illegal - (i) Shashi Kant Garg vs. CIT 285 ITR 158 (Alld.) (attached) (ii) Aditya Narain Verma vs. DCIT ITA No.4166/Del/2013. (attached) (xvi) Liability to pay capital gains tax arises in the year when the agreement to sell

NIRMAL SINGH,AYODHYA vs. ITO WARD-1,, FAIZABAD

NIRMAL SINGH,AYODHYA vs. ITO WARD-1,, FAIZABAD

M/S STANDARD FROZEN FOODS EXPORTS PVT LTD,HAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CC-II, KANPUR

KAMAL KANT VERMA,HAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, KANPUR

SACHIN VERMA,HAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - II, KANPUR

PRADEEP KUMAR,LUCKNOW vs. ACIT-1, LUCKNOW