GURU KRIPA ASSOCIATES,BAREILLY vs. PR. CIT, , BAREILLY

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands dismissed

bogus. In fact, the inference\ndrawn by the AO, that only a portion of\nit could be treated as bogus/unexplained,\n86-95\nwas not incorrect. Therefore, we hold that\nthe ld. Pr. CIT's finding of error is based\non incorrect appreciation of the facts\nbefore it, and his finding that the assessee\nhad not been able to substantiate

BADRI PRASAD VISHWA NATH JEWELS,LUCKNOW vs. ACIT-2, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

B) In this case assessment order dated 30/12/2019 was passed under section 143(3) of the Act whereby the assessee’s total income was I.T.A. No.382/Lkw/2023 Assessment Year:2017-18 3 determined at Rs.9,53,08,285/- as against returned income of Rs.1,78,55,770/-. In the aforesaid assessment order, an addition of Rs.2,54,52,515/- was made

M/S MADHAV BISCUITS PVT. LTD. ,KANPUR vs. DCIT -6, KANPUR, KANPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

B) In this case the assessee filed return of income declaring loss of Rs.1,04,12,577/-. Assessment order dated 29/02/2016 was passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“IT Act” for short) whereby the loss was assessed at Rs.55,58,604/-. In the assessment order, the additions made included an amount

ACIT, KANPUR vs. ARPIT OMAR, KANPUR

Appeal of the Revenue is dismissed in limine, being not maintainable due to law tax effect

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Anadee Nath Misshraacit, Kanpur Arpit Omar V. 10/503, Laxmi Niwas, Hig-9, F1, Barra-8, Allenganj, Kanpur-208001. Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh- 208027. Pan: Abapo2156Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Ashish Jaiswal, Adv Respondent By: Shri Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl. Cit(Dr) O R D E R

section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as to “the Act”), pertaining to the assessment year 2016-17. The grounds of appeal of the Revenue are as under: - “1. Whether on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT (A)-IV, Kanpur has erred in deleting the disallowance

KASHI NATH SETH SARRAF PRIVATE LIMITED,HARDOI vs. ACIT, SITAPUR, SITAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

40A(3) and no defect has been pointed out\nby the learned assessing officer in respect of any of\nthe purchase bill.\n\n11.\nThe sales receipts are below Rs 2 lac and are in\naccordance with the Income Tax provisions.There is no\nrequirement of KYC below Rs 2 lac sale and all the\nsales bills are in accordance with