Search: bogus purchases

3 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 260Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi103 Mumbai57 Chennai43 Amritsar34 Jaipur29 Kolkata11 Nagpur7 Indore5 Ahmedabad4 Lucknow3 Surat3 Bangalore2 Jodhpur1 Hyderabad1 Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 41(1)8 Section 684 Section 69C4 Section 143(3)3 Addition to Income3 Section 412 Section 372 Section 36(1)(va)2 Disallowance2

INCOME TAX OFFICER-3(1), KANPUR vs. SHRI ARVIND KUMAR GUPTA, KANPUR

In the result, the appeal is held to be allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 174/LKW/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow11 Jun 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SH.KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Sanjeev Krishna Sharma, Addl CIT (DR)

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 268A

purchase and sale of shares had not been questioned and it had not been proved by the ld. AO to be false. It was further submitted that the assessee’s case for exemption under section 10(38)stood supported by a large number of case laws which were squarely applicable to the facts of the assessee’s case. Some

INCOME TAX OFFICER-3(1), KANPUR vs. SHRI ARVIND KUMAR GUPTA, KANPUR

MOHD. ASFAND AKHTAR,KANPUR vs. DEPUTI COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CC-2, KANPUR

INCOME TAX OFFICER-3(1), KANPUR vs. SHRI ARVIND KUMAR GUPTA, KANPUR

MOHD. ASFAND AKHTAR,KANPUR vs. DEPUTI COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CC-2, KANPUR

DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CC-2,, KANPUR vs. SHRI.MOHAMMAD ASFAND AKHTAR, KANPUR