BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

18 results for “TDS”+ Section 6Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi55Raipur39Kolkata39Mumbai27Bangalore26Ahmedabad23Jodhpur20Lucknow18Pune16Jaipur16Cochin10Nagpur10Chandigarh10Indore9Rajkot8Amritsar7Surat6Chennai5Cuttack4Varanasi3Karnataka1Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 206C125TDS18Natural Justice14Limitation/Time-bar13Section 206C(1)8Section 206C(6)7Condonation of Delay7

THE DISTRICT MINING OFFICER,BAREILLY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

ITA 246/LKW/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow30 Jun 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Revenue byFor Respondent: Date of hearing
Section 133ASection 206CSection 250

section 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The grounds of appeal are as under:- “1. BECAUSE, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the impugned order passed by the Ld. CIT (A), sustaining the order of ITO (TDS

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COLLECTORATE,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

In the result, all the six appeals of the assessee for Assessment Years 2010-11 to 2015-16 are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 302/LKW/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow18 Oct 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri. Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra Kumar Yadav, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigarm, D.R
Section 206C

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assessee is not a "person" for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COLLECTORATE,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

In the result, all the six appeals of the assessee for Assessment Years 2010-11 to 2015-16 are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 305/LKW/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow18 Oct 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri. Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra Kumar Yadav, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigarm, D.R
Section 206C

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assessee is not a "person" for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COLLECTORATE,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

In the result, all the six appeals of the assessee for Assessment Years 2010-11 to 2015-16 are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 307/LKW/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow18 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri. Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra Kumar Yadav, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigarm, D.R
Section 206C

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assessee is not a "person" for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COLLECTORATE,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

In the result, all the six appeals of the assessee for Assessment Years 2010-11 to 2015-16 are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 306/LKW/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow18 Oct 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri. Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra Kumar Yadav, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigarm, D.R
Section 206C

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assessee is not a "person" for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COLLECTORATE,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

In the result, all the six appeals of the assessee for Assessment Years 2010-11 to 2015-16 are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 304/LKW/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow18 Oct 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri. Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra Kumar Yadav, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigarm, D.R
Section 206C

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assessee is not a "person" for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE COLLECTORATE,SHAHJAHANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILLY

In the result, all the six appeals of the assessee for Assessment Years 2010-11 to 2015-16 are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 303/LKW/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow18 Oct 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri. Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra Kumar Yadav, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Amit Nigarm, D.R
Section 206C

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assessee is not a "person" for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/DISTRICT MINING OFFICER,PILIBHIT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILY

In the result, the appeals of the assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 362/LKW/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow16 Dec 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri A.D Jain & Shri T.S. Kapoor

Section 206C

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assesses is not a 'person' for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/DISTRICT MINING OFFICER,PILIBHIT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILY

In the result, the appeals of the assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 363/LKW/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow16 Dec 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri A.D Jain & Shri T.S. Kapoor

Section 206C

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assesses is not a 'person' for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/DISTRICT MINING OFFICER,PILIBHIT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILY

In the result, the appeals of the assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 364/LKW/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow16 Dec 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A.D Jain & Shri T.S. Kapoor

Section 206C

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assesses is not a 'person' for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/DISTRICT MINING OFFICER,PILIBHIT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILY

In the result, the appeals of the assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 366/LKW/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow16 Dec 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri A.D Jain & Shri T.S. Kapoor

Section 206C

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assesses is not a 'person' for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/DISTRICT MINING OFFICER,PILIBHIT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILY

In the result, the appeals of the assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 367/LKW/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow16 Dec 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.D Jain & Shri T.S. Kapoor

Section 206C

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assesses is not a 'person' for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/DISTRICT MINING OFFICER,PILIBHIT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILY

In the result, the appeals of the assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 365/LKW/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow16 Dec 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A.D Jain & Shri T.S. Kapoor

Section 206C

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assesses is not a 'person' for the purpose of section

THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE/DISTRICT MINING OFFICER,PILIBHIT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BAREILY

In the result, the appeals of the assessee stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 368/LKW/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow16 Dec 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri A.D Jain & Shri T.S. Kapoor

Section 206C

TDS) u/s 206C (6A) of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable and bad in law since the instant assesses is not a 'person' for the purpose of section

M/S. LALA BHARAT LAL AND SONS,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed whereas the stay petitions are dismissed

ITA 16/LKW/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow19 Feb 2020AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri. T.S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar, D.R
Section 206CSection 206C(1)Section 206C(6)

6A) and 206C(7) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was submitted that before the Assessing Officer and the ld. CIT(A), the averment of the assessee was that the sale/trading done by the assessee did not tantamount to sale of scrap as defined in Explanation (b) to section 206C of the Act, as the same had not been

M/S. LALA BHARAT LAL AND SONS,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed whereas the stay petitions are dismissed

ITA 15/LKW/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow19 Feb 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri. T.S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar, D.R
Section 206CSection 206C(1)Section 206C(6)

6A) and 206C(7) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was submitted that before the Assessing Officer and the ld. CIT(A), the averment of the assessee was that the sale/trading done by the assessee did not tantamount to sale of scrap as defined in Explanation (b) to section 206C of the Act, as the same had not been

M/S. LALA BHARAT LAL AND SONS,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed whereas the stay petitions are dismissed

ITA 14/LKW/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow19 Feb 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri. T.S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar, D.R
Section 206CSection 206C(1)Section 206C(6)

6A) and 206C(7) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was submitted that before the Assessing Officer and the ld. CIT(A), the averment of the assessee was that the sale/trading done by the assessee did not tantamount to sale of scrap as defined in Explanation (b) to section 206C of the Act, as the same had not been

M/S SINGHAL CONCAST PVT. LTD,LUCKNOW vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-1, LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 10/LKW/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow27 Apr 2022AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

Section 206Section 206CSection 206C(1)Section 206C(6)

TDS-1), 93/7, Grain Market, Ganeshganj, Lucknow. Lucknow. PAN:AANCS1093H (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Shri Rakesh Garg, Advocate Respondent by Shri Harish Gidwani, D.R. Date of hearing 05/04/2022 Date of pronouncement 27/04/2022 O R D E R PER T.S. KAPOOR:A.M. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of learned CIT(A), dated 16/12/2021 pertaining