RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT, (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

section 54F of \nIncome Tax Act. \n5. Whether on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in \ndeleting the addition of Rs.37,00,000/- on account of agricultural income in tune \nof Rs.52,00,000/-. \n6. Whether on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in \ndeleting

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW vs. RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY, GONDA

section 54F of Income Tax Act, 1961.\nC.O.No.27/Lkw/2024, A.Y. 2021-22 (Assessee’s C.O.)\n1. Because the Ld. CIT(A) Lucknow-III has erred on facts & law while\nsustaining the addition of Rs.9,76,800/- being difference between amount\ndetermined by DVO, with sustaining the addition of Rs.9,76,800/- and amount of investment shown by\nassessee

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT, (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

54F\nof Income Tax Act, 1961.\n\nI.T.A. No.608/Lkw/2024, A.Y. 2020-21 (Revenue’s Appeal)\n\n1. Whether on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in\ndeleting the addition of Rs.93,93,846/- on account of applying NP rate @ 11% on\ntotal turnover after rejecting the book result shown, in section

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW vs. RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY, GONDA UP

54F\nof Income Tax Act, 1961.\nI.T.A. No.608/Lkw/2024, A.Y. 2020-21 (Revenue’s Appeal)\n1. Whether on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in\ndeleting the addition of Rs.1,45,53,688/- on account of applying NP rate @ 11% on\ntotal turnover after rejecting the book result shown, in section

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW vs. RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY, GONDA UP

section 145(3) of the Income Tax Act,\nwithout appreciating the fact that the assessee failed to produce books of accounts,\nbills, and vouchers during the assessment and search proceedings, and that the trading\nresults shown by the assessee were not found open to verification.\n3. Whether on facts and circumstances of the case

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT(CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

54F of the Act. The Ld. CIT(A)\nconsidering the facts and circumstances of the case and in accordance with\nlaw has allowed the appeal.\nIssue No. 11 – AY 2021-22\nAddition due to Non deduction of TDS on payment of Rs.3074000\n@ 30% i.e. 922200/- in violation of the provision of section

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW vs. RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY, GONDA U.P.

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

54F of the Act. The Ld. CIT(A) considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in accordance with law has allowed the appeal. Issue No. 11 – AY 2021-22 Addition due to Non deduction of TDS on payment of Rs. 3074000 @ 30% i.e. 922200/- in violation of the provision of section

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

54F of the Act. The Ld. CIT(A) considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in accordance with law has allowed the appeal. Issue No. 11 – AY 2021-22 Addition due to Non deduction of TDS on payment of Rs. 3074000 @ 30% i.e. 922200/- in violation of the provision of section

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

In the result, the outcome of the appeals and Cross Objections are as under:

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

54F of the Act. The Ld. CIT(A) considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in accordance with law has allowed the appeal. Issue No. 11 – AY 2021-22 Addition due to Non deduction of TDS on payment of Rs. 3074000 @ 30% i.e. 922200/- in violation of the provision of section