Search: TDS | BharatTax

7 results for “TDS”+ Section 282(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 80P7 Section 2016 Deduction5 TDS5 Section 10(5)4 Section 201(1)4 Section 1924 Survey u/s 133A4 Disallowance2 Addition to Income

SAHKARI GANNA VIKAS SAMITI LIMITED RUPAPUR,HARDOI vs. THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT/NFAC, ACIT, SITAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 663/LKW/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow30 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

For Appellant: Sh. K.R. Rastogi, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Koushlendra Tiwari, CIT DR

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

282 (SC), since it was not attributable to the activities of the society and since the deduction under section 80P(2)(a) was only available to the, ‘operational income’ of the business. Relying upon the said decision, he refused to allow this interest of Rs. 39,93,216/- as a deduction under section 80P(2

SAHKARI GANNA VIKAS SAMITI LIMITED RUPAPUR,HARDOI vs. THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT/NFAC, ACIT, SITAPUR

SAHKARI GANNA VIKAS SAMITI LIMITED RUPAPUR,HARDOI vs. THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT/NFAC, ACIT, SITAPUR

M/S RAJ KUMAR SINGH & CO.,LUCKNOW vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LUCKNOW

STATE BANK OF INDIA,,KANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-II, KANPUR

S.B.I RBO III (ADMIN OFFICE),KANPUR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), KANPUR

STATE BANK OF INDIA,,KANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-II, KANPUR

STATE BANK OF INDIA, FUND SETTLEMENT OFFICE,KANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)-II, KANPUR

M/S JAMA CORPORATION PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. DYT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) , KANPUR