Search: TDS | BharatTax

6 results for “TDS”+ Section 275(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 26314 Section 271C6 Section 1956 Section 143(3)4 Section 253(3)3 Section 1323 Search & Seizure3 Condonation of Delay3 Addition to Income3 Natural Justice

M/S MODEL TANNERS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KANPUR

In the result, both the appeals are partly allowed

ITA 701/LKW/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow18 Jan 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Bar, CIT (DR)

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 195Section 263Section 263(1)Section 80ISection 9Section 9(1)Section 9(1)(vii)

1 & 2. 12. The Assessing Officer did not make any addition with respect to the above items, but for job work charges, which addition was deleted by the ld. CIT(A). 13. The Assessing Officer made the following disallowances/additions:- i) Disallowance under section 80-IB of the Act : Rs.26,24,573/- ii) Interest on TDS : Rs.1,699/- iii) Addition under

M/S MODEL TANNERS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KANPUR

M/S MODEL TANNERS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KANPUR

M/S MODEL TANNERS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,KANPUR vs. ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, KANPUR

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-II, LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW vs. RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY, GONDA U.P.

RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY,GONDA vs. DCIT/ACIT (CENTRAL)-2, LUCKNOW

NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA,KANPUR vs. A CIT (TDS), KANPUR